Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33281304›Full record

ArticleFood control2021

Covid-19 pandemic effects on food safety - Multi-country survey study.

Ilija Djekic, Aleksandra Nikolić, Mirza Uzunović, Aluwé Marijke, Aijun Liu, Jiqin Han, Mladen Brnčić, Nada Knežević, Photis Papademas, Katerina Lemoniati and 19 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food control, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
28.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 20 institutions in 16 countries.

Ilija DjekicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Aleksandra NikolićFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Mirza UzunovićFaculty of Agriculture and Food Sciences, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Aluwé MarijkeAnimal Sciences Unit, Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (ILVO), Scheldeweg, Melle, Belgium.
Aijun LiuChina Center for Food Security Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Jiqin HanChina Center for Food Security Studies, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Mladen BrnčićFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Croatia.
Nada KneževićPodravka Food Industry, Koprivnica, Croatia.
Photis PapademasDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science, Cyprus University of Technology, Cyprus.
Katerina LemoniatiVeterinary Public Health Division, Veterinary Services, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Cyprus.
Franziska WitteDIL - Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e. V. - German Institute of Food Technologies, Quakenbrück, Germany.
Nino TerjungDIL - Deutsches Institut für Lebensmitteltechnik e. V. - German Institute of Food Technologies, Quakenbrück, Germany.
Maria PapageorgiouDepartment of Food Science and Technology, International Hellenic University Thessaloniki, Greece.
Kyriaki G ZinoviadouDepartment of Food Science and Technology, Perrotis College, American Farm School, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Antonella Dalle ZotteDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova Agripolis, Padova, Italy.
Erika PellattieroDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padova Agripolis, Padova, Italy.
Bartosz G SołowiejDepartment of Milk Technology and Hydrocolloids, Faculty of Food Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences in Lublin, Lublin, Poland.
Raquel P F GuinéCERNAS-IPV Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Paula CorreiaCERNAS-IPV Research Centre, Polytechnic Institute of Viseu, Viseu, Portugal.
Alexandrina SirbuConstantin Brancoveanu University, FMMAE, Ramnicu Valcea, Romania.
Liliana VasilescuNational Agricultural Research and Development Institute Fundulea, Romania.
Anastasia A SemenovaV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Oksana A KuznetsovaV.M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Urška Vrabič BrodnjakFaculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mirian PateiroFundación Centro Tecnolóxico da Carne, San Cibrao Das Viñas, Ourense, Spain.
Jose Manuel LorenzoÁrea de Tecnología de Los Alimentos, Facultad de Ciencias de Ourense, Universidad de Vigo, 32004, Ourense, Spain.
Andriy GetyaNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Tetiana KodakPoltava State Agrarian Academy, Department of Food Technology, Poltava, Ukraine.
Igor TomasevicFaculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
German Institute of Food Technologies · DENanjing Agricultural University · CNResearch Center for Natural Resources, Environment and Society · PTRussian Academy of Sciences · RUUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Sarajevo · BAAmerican Farm School · GRCentro de Estudios AndalucesConstantin Brâncoveanu University · ROCyprus University of Technology · CYInternational Hellenic University · GRMinistry of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Environment · CYNational University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine · UAPoltava State Agrarian University · UAUniversidade de Vigo · ESUniversity of Life Sciences in Lublin · PLUniversity of Ljubljana · SIUniversity of Zagreb · HRVlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides an important insight into the response of food safety systems during the first months of the pandemic, elevating the perspective of preventing Covid-19 within conventional food safety management systems. A multi-country survey was conducted in 16 countries involving 825 food companies. Based on the results of the survey, it is obvious that the level of maturity of a food safety system in place is the main trigger in classifying companies and their responses to the pandemic challenge. Staff awareness and hygiene are the two most important attributes in combating Covid-19, opposed to temperature checking of workers in food establishment and health protocols from the World Health Organization, recognized as attributes with limited salience and importance. Companies confirmed implementation of more restrictive hygiene procedures during the pandemic and the need for purchasing more additional personal protective equipment. Retailers were identified as the food supply chain link mostly affected by the pandemic opposed to food storage facilities ranked as least affected. During this challenging period, all companies declared that food safety has not been compromised at any moment. It is important to note that less than a half of the food companies had documented any emergency plans associated with pandemics and health issues in place.

Indexed as

BestCovid-19 attributesEmergency preparednessFood safety systemsFood supply chainWorst analysis

Identifiers

PMID33281304
PMCPMC7707641
OpenAlexW3108936104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.