ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2020
Effects of a dual task and different levels of divided attention on motor-related cortical potential.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Attention skills, learning and academic abilities in children and adolescents with genetic disorders: a systematic review.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Pooled it
- The Role of the Different Components of Attention on Observational Learning in Early Primary School Children: New Insights and Educational Implications.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Social functioning profiles, attention skills and learning: what relationships in early childhood?Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- A novel approach for the EEG-driven assessment of divided attention through mutual information theory: A case study at the wheel.PloS one · 2026Article
- The Role of Hearing Aids in Improving Dual-Task Gait Performance in Older Adults With Presbycusis: A Cognitive and Motor Analysis.Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Effects of divided attention on movement-related cortical potential in community-dwelling elderly adults: A preliminary study.Heliyon · 2024Article
- How does a motor or cognitive dual-task affect our sense of upper limb proprioception?PloS one · 2024Article
- Readiness potential reflects the intention of sit-to-stand movement.Cognitive neurodynamics · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of divided attention on motor-related cortical potential (MRCP) during dual task performance while the difficulty of the secondary task was altered. [Participants and Methods] Twenty-two right-handed healthy volunteers participated in the study. MRCPs were recorded during two tasks, a single task (ST) and a simple (S-DT) or complex dual task (C-DT). The ST involved a self-paced tapping task in which the participants extended their right index finger. In the dual task, the participants performed the ST and a visual number counting task simultaneously. [Results] The amplitude and integral value of MRCP from electroencephalography electrode C3 was significantly higher in the S-DT than in the ST, whereas they were similar between the C-DT and the ST. Medium-load divided attention (i.e., S-DT) led to significantly more changes in the MRCP magnitude than did low-load divided attention (i.e., ST). However, the MRCP of high-load divided attention (i.e., C-DT) was similar to that of low-load divided attention. [Conclusion] These results suggest that MRCP reflects the function of or network between the supplementary motor area and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, and may serve as a marker for screening the capacity of individuals to perform dual tasks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.