ArticleClinical obesity2021
Physicians certified by the American Board of Obesity Medicine provide evidence-based care.
Article in Clinical obesity, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Obesity-informed OSA care: defining the expanding boundary of sleep medicine.Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine · 2026Article
- Screening, Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Staging of Obesity in Adults: Standards of Care in Overweight and Obesity-2026.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Review
- Shortage of Obesity Medicine Specialists in the United States.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2026Article
- Obesity Care Barriers in Kidney Transplant Candidates and Recipients: Perspectives from a Survey of Transplant Experts.Obesity facts · 2026Article
- Pharmacologic treatment of obesity in adults: Standards of care in overweight and obesity.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2026Review
- Opportunities for General Internal Medicine to Promote Equity in Obesity Care.Journal of general internal medicine · 2025Article
- Electronic health records tools for treating obesity among adult patients in primary care: A scoping review.Obesity pillars · 2025Article
- Comparing clinical practice habits among obesity medicine physicians by patient, physician and clinic factors.Obesity pillars · 2025Article
- Duties, tasks, knowledge and skills of an obesity medicine physician: A practice analysis.Obesity pillars · 2024Article
- Implementation of Obesity Science Into Clinical Practice: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- A Primary Care-Based Weight Navigation Program.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Use of medications associated with weight change among participants in the All of Us research programme.Clinical obesity · 2023Article
- General Practitioners' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Dietary Advice for Weight Control in Their Overweight Patients: A Scoping Review.Nutrients · 2023Article
- Letter to the Editor ofObesity pillars · 2023Article
- Disparities in Access and Quality of Obesity Care.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Obesity medicine as a subspecialty and United States certification - A review.Obesity pillars · 2023Review
- Primary care providers' perceived barriers to obesity treatment and opportunities for improvement: A mixed methods study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Developing weight navigation program to support personalized and effective obesity management in primary care settings: protocol for a quality improvement program with an embedded single-arm pilot study.Primary health care research & development · 2022Article
- A national evaluation of geographic accessibility and provider availability of obesity medicine diplomates in the United States between 2011 and 2019.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Our objective was to determine the clinical services offered by American Board of Obesity Medicine (ABOM) Diplomates and whether guideline concordant services varied by clinical practice attributes. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of the 2019 ABOM Diplomate survey (response rate 19.2%). Respondents (n = 494) self-reported services offered: nutrition, exercise, mental health, minimally invasive bariatric procedures, perioperative bariatric surgical care and FDA-approved anti-obesity medications. We graded concordance of services offered with three evidence-based obesity guidelines, and then conducted bivariate analyses comparing concordance by practice attributes. Most responding ABOM Diplomates offered nutrition (90.1%), exercise (67.8%) and mental health (76.7%). Few offered minimally invasive procedures (24.3%), and most provided perioperative surgical care (63.0%). Most (83.4%) prescribed FDA-approved medications-typically both short- and long-term agents (70.9%). Few Diplomates had low concordance with the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology/The Obesity Society (AHA/ACC/TOS) guidelines (24.7%). Those who managed more obesity-related conditions and endorsed AHA/ACC/TOS guideline use had higher concordance with these recommendations. No differences in guideline concordance existed by population, clinical effort or location. We found similar findings regarding concordance with ) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology and Obesity Medicine Association guidelines. In conclusion, most responding ABOM Diplomates offer evidence-based obesity medicine services. Clinicians may therefore have increased confidence in patient receipt of evidence-based care when referring to an ABOM Diplomate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.