Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33280207›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical practice2021

Hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin treatment, QT interval and ventricular arrhythmias in hospitalised patients with COVID-19.

İbrahim Halil Özdemir, Bülent Özlek, Mehmet Burak Özen, Ramazan Gündüz, Nurullah Çetin, Ali Rıza Bilge

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

İbrahim Halil ÖzdemirDepartment of Cardiology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.
Bülent ÖzlekDepartment of Cardiology, Mugla Sitki Kocman University Training and Research Hospital, Mugla, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5429-1323
Mehmet Burak ÖzenDepartment of Cardiology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.
Ramazan GündüzDepartment of Cardiology, Manisa City Hospital, Manisa, Turkey.
Nurullah ÇetinDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
Ali Rıza BilgeDepartment of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Manisa Celal Bayar University, Manisa, Turkey.
Manisa Celal Bayar University · TRMuğla University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZM) are widely used in off-label treatment of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). However, cardiac safety of these drugs is still controversial in COVID-19. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate association of HCQ or HCQ + AZM treatment regimens, corrected QT (QTc) interval and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in hospitalized patients.

methodsThis is a single-center, retrospective and observational study. All data were extracted from the electronic medical records. The initial and post-treatment mean QTc intervals were calculated and compared in patients with HCQ alone or HCQ + AZM therapy. Associated factors with QTc prolongation, the incidence of ventricular arrhythmia during treatment and in-hospital mortality because of ventricular arrhythmias were evaluated.

resultsOur cohort comprised 101 hospitalized COVID-19 patients (mean age of 49.60 ± 18 years, 54.4% men). HCQ + AZM combination therapy group (n = 56) was more likely to have comorbidities. After 5-days treatment, 19 (18.8%) patients had QTc prolongation, and significant increase in the QTc interval was observed in both two groups (P < .001). However, HCQ + AZM combination group had significantly higher ΔQTc compared to HCQ group (22.5 ± 18.4 vs 7.5 ± 15.3 ms, P < .001). All of 101 patients completed the 5-days treatment without interruption. Also, no malignant ventricular arrhythmia or death secondary to ventricular arrhythmia occurred during the treatment in both groups.

conclusionsThe present study revealed that although HCQ + AZM treatment was independently associated with QTc prolongation, none of patients experienced malignant ventricular arrhythmia or death during treatment. Further prospective studies are needed to determine the exact implications of these drugs on arrhythmias in patients with COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsArrhythmias, CardiacAzithromycinComorbidityCOVID-19Drug Therapy, CombinationElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineLong QT SyndromeMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

PMID33280207
PMCPMC7883090
OpenAlexW3113343717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.