Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33280122›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2021

Replaying the evolutionary tape to investigate subgenome dominance in allopolyploid Brassica napus.

Kevin A Bird, Chad E Niederhuth, Shujun Ou, Malia Gehan, J Chris Pires, Zhiyong Xiong, Robert VanBuren, Patrick P Edger

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Regulatory divergence of homoeologs underlies network optimization for fiber improvement in domesticated cotton.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Genome-Wide Analysis ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Kevin A BirdDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3174-3646
Chad E NiederhuthDepartment of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3268-9079
Shujun OuDepartment of Ecology, Evolution and Organismal Biology, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5938-7180
Malia GehanDonald Danforth Plant Science Center, St Louis, MO, 63123, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3238-2627
J Chris PiresDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9682-2639
Zhiyong XiongKey Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biotechnology, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot, 010070, China.
Robert VanBurenDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2133-2760
Patrick P EdgerDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6836-3041
Michigan State University · USDonald Danforth Plant Science Center · USInner Mongolia University · CNIowa State University · USUniversity of Missouri · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allopolyploidisation merges evolutionarily distinct parental genomes (subgenomes) into a single nucleus. A frequent observation is that one subgenome is 'dominant' over the other subgenome, often being more highly expressed. Here, we 'replayed the evolutionary tape' with six isogenic resynthesised Brassica napus allopolyploid lines and investigated subgenome dominance patterns over the first 10 generations postpolyploidisation. We found that the same subgenome was consistently more dominantly expressed in all lines and generations and that >70% of biased gene pairs showed the same dominance patterns across all lines and an in silico hybrid of the parents. Gene network analyses indicated an enrichment for network interactions and several biological functions for the Brassica oleracea subgenome biased pairs, but no enrichment was identified for Brassica rapa subgenome biased pairs. Furthermore, DNA methylation differences between subgenomes mirrored the observed gene expression bias towards the dominant subgenome in all lines and generations. Many of these differences in gene expression and methylation were also found when comparing the progenitor genomes, suggesting that subgenome dominance is partly related to parental genome differences rather than just a byproduct of allopolyploidisation. These findings demonstrate that 'replaying the evolutionary tape' in an allopolyploid results in largely repeatable and predictable subgenome expression dominance patterns.

Indexed as

Brassica napusBrassica rapaBiological EvolutionGenome, PlantPolyploidyBrassica napusDNA methylationgenomic shockhybridisationpolyploidyrapeseedsubgenome dominance

Identifiers

PMID33280122
PMCPMC7986222
OpenAlexW3110970923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.