Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33279877›Full record

ArticleJMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies2020

An Affordable, User-friendly Telerehabilitation System Assembled Using Existing Technologies for Individuals Isolated With COVID-19: Development and Feasibility Study.

Masahiko Mukaino, Tsuyoshi Tatemoto, Nobuhiro Kumazawa, Shigeo Tanabe, Masaki Katoh, Eiichi Saitoh, Yohei Otaka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Home-Based Robotic Upper Limbs Cardiac Telerehabilitation System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Masahiko Mukaino *Department of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4348-8715
Tsuyoshi Tatemoto *Faculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8952-1651
Nobuhiro KumazawaFaculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8068-1322
Shigeo TanabeFaculty of Rehabilitation, School of Health Sciences, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1993-5896
Masaki KatohDepartment of Rehabilitation, Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5583-0904
Eiichi SaitohDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5069-6198
Yohei OtakaDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine I, School of Medicine, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6797-2782
Fujita Health University · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsolation due to a COVID-19 infection can limit activities and cause physical and mental decline, especially in older adults and people with disabilities. However, due to limited contact, adequate rehabilitation is difficult to provide for quarantined patients. Telerehabilitation technology could be a solution; however, issues specific to COVID-19 should be taken into consideration, such as strict quarantine and respiratory symptoms, as well as accessibility to deal with rapid increases in need due to the pandemic.

objectiveThis study aims to develop and to investigate the feasibility of a telerehabilitation system for patients who are quarantined due to COVID-19 by combining existing commercial devices and computer applications.

methodsA multidisciplinary team has identified the requirements for a telerehabilitation system for COVID-19 and developed the system to satisfy those requirements. In the subsequent feasibility study, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 (N=10; mean age 60 years, SD 18 years) were included. A single session of telerehabilitation consisted of stretching exercises, a 15-minute exercise program, and a video exercise program conducted under real-time guidance by a physical therapist through a video call. The system included a tablet computer, a pulse oximeter, videoconferencing software, and remote control software. The feasibility of the system was evaluated using the Telemedicine Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQ; 14 items) and an additional questionnaire on the telerehabilitation system (5 items). Each item was rated from "1 = strongly disagree" to "5 = strongly agree."

resultsThe telerehabilitation system was developed by combining existing devices and applications, including a pulse oximeter and remote control mechanism, to achieve user-friendliness, affordability, and safety, which were determined as the system requirements. In the feasibility study, 9 out of 10 patients were able to use the telerehabilitation system without any on-site help. On the TSQ, the mean score for each item was 4.7 (SD 0.7), and in the additional items regarding telerehabilitation, the mean score for each item was 4.3 (SD 1.0).

conclusionsThese findings support the feasibility of this simple telerehabilitation system in quarantined patients with COVID-19, encouraging further investigation on the merit of the system's use in clinical practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19eHealthfeasibilityisolationrehabilitationtelemedicinetelerehabilitationuser-friendly

Identifiers

PMID33279877
PMCPMC7732353
OpenAlexW3112453931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.