Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33279862›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance2020

An ELISA method to assess HDAC inhibitor-induced alterations to P. falciparum histone lysine acetylation.

Eva Hesping, Tina S Skinner-Adams, Gillian M Fisher, Thomas Kurz, Katherine T Andrews

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eva HespingGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Tina S Skinner-AdamsGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Gillian M FisherGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.
Thomas KurzInstitut für Pharmazeutische und Medizinische Chemie, Heinrich Heine Universität, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Katherine T AndrewsGriffith Institute for Drug Discovery, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia. Electronic address: k.andrews@griffith.edu.au.
Griffith University · AUHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prevention and treatment of malaria requires a multi-pronged approach, including the development of drugs that have novel modes of action. Histone deacetylases (HDACs), enzymes involved in post-translational protein modification, are potential new drug targets for malaria. However, the lack of recombinant P. falciparum HDACs and suitable activity assays, has made the investigation of compounds designed to target these enzymes challenging. Current approaches are indirect and include assessing total deacetylase activity and protein hyperacetylation via Western blot. These approaches either do not allow differential compound effects to be determined or suffer from low throughput. Here we investigated dot blot and ELISA methods as new, higher throughput assays to detect histone lysine acetylation changes in P. falciparum parasites. As the ELISA method was found to be superior to the dot blot assay using the control HDAC inhibitor vorinostat, it was used to evaluate the histone H3 and H4 lysine acetylation changes mediated by a panel of six HDAC inhibitors that were shown to inhibit P. falciparum deacetylase activity. Vorinostat, panobinostat, trichostatin A, romidepsin and entinostat all caused an ~3-fold increase in histone H4 acetylation using a tetra-acetyl lysine antibody. Tubastatin A, the only human HDAC6-specific inhibitor tested, also caused H4 hyperacetylation, but to a lesser extent than the other compounds. Further investigation revealed that all compounds, except tubastatin A, caused hyperacetylation of the individual N-terminal H4 lysines 5, 8, 12 and 16. These data indicate that tubastatin A impacts P. falciparum H4 acetylation differently to the other HDAC inhibitors tested. In contrast, all compounds caused hyperacetylation of histone H3. In summary, the ELISA developed in this study provides a higher throughput approach to assessing differential effects of antiplasmodial compounds on histone acetylation levels and is therefore a useful new tool in the investigation of HDAC inhibitors for malaria.

Indexed as

Histone Deacetylase InhibitorsLysineAcetylationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHistonesHumansProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsHistonesLysineELISAHDAC inhibitorHistoneLysine acetylationMalariaP. falciparum

Identifiers

PMID33279862
PMCPMC7724001
OpenAlexW3094653659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.