Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33279229›Full record

ArticleBrazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)

[Guiding opioid-free intravenous antinociception with the Analgesia Nociception Index: a case report].

Sean Coeckelenbergh, Jean-Pierre Estebe

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sean CoeckelenberghUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Erasme University Hospital, Department of Anesthesiology, Brussels, Belgium. Electronic address: sean.coeckelenbergh@ulb.be.
Jean-Pierre EstebeUniversité de Rennes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Department of Anesthesiology, Rennes, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes · FRUniversité Libre de Bruxelles · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid-free anesthesia decreases the incidence of opioid adverse events, but its optimal antinociceptive depth has not been clearly defined. Personalizing intraoperative opioid-free infusions with a nociception monitor may be the solution. CASE REPORT: We describe the feasibility and potential limitations of titrating opioid-free antinociception during major abdominal surgery using the Analgesia Nociception Index (Mdoloris, Lille, France) in an obese patient. After stabilizing the patient's nociception-antinociception balance intraoperatively we quickly reversed anesthesia and the patient did not require postoperative opioids.

conclusionPersonalizing opioid-free antinociception with a nociception monitor is feasible. It may optimize intraoperative antinociception and improve postoperative comfort.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, InhalationAnesthesia, IntravenousNociceptionAnalgesiaAnalgesics, OpioidElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPrecision MedicineUrinary IncontinenceVesicovaginal FistulaAnalgesics, OpioidDorMedicina perioperatóriaMonitoringMonitorizaçãoNocicepçãoNociceptionPainPerioperative medicine

Identifiers

PMID33279229
PMCPMC9373240
OpenAlexW3096107356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.