Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33278900›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2020

A study of medication errors during the prescription stage in the pediatric critical care services of a secondary-tertiary level public hospital.

Lorena Michele Brennan-Bourdon, Alan O Vázquez-Alvarez, Jahaira Gallegos-Llamas, Manuel Koninckx-Cañada, José Luis Marco-Garbayo, Selene G Huerta-Olvera

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Determining Medication Errors in an Adult Intensive Care Unit.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lorena Michele Brennan-BourdonComisión para la Protección contra Riesgos Sanitarios del Estado de Jalisco (COPRISJAL), Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Alan O Vázquez-AlvarezInstituto de Terapéutica Experimental y Clínica (INTEC). Departamento de Fisiología. Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Jahaira Gallegos-LlamasEgresada de la Licenciatura en Químico Fármaco Biólogo, Centro Universitario de la Ciénega, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
Manuel Koninckx-CañadaServicio de Farmacia, Hospital Francesc de Borja, Gandía, Valencia, Spain.
José Luis Marco-GarbayoServicio de Farmacia, Hospital Francesc de Borja, Gandía, Valencia, Spain.
Selene G Huerta-OlveraDepartamento de Ciencias Médicas y de la Vida. Centro Universitario de la Ciénega. Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico. selene.huerta@academicos.udg.mx.
Universidad de Guadalajara · MXSecretaría de Salud de Jalisco · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedication Errors (MEs) are considered the most common type of error in pediatric critical care services. Moreover, the ME rate in pediatric patients is up to three times higher than the rate for adults. Nevertheless, information in pediatric population is still limited, particularly in emergency/critical care practice. The purpose of this study was to describe and analyze MEs in the pediatric critical care services during the prescription stage in a Mexican secondary-tertiary level public hospital.

methodsA cross-sectional study to detect MEs was performed in all pediatric critical care services [pediatric emergency care (PEC), pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), and neonatal intermediate care unit (NIMCU)] of a public teaching hospital. A pharmacist identified MEs by direct observation as the error detection method and MEs were classified according to the updated classification for medication errors by the Ruíz-Jarabo 2000 working group. Thereafter, these were subclassified in clinically relevant MEs.

resultsIn 2347 prescriptions from 301 patients from all critical care services, a total of 1252 potential MEs (72%) were identified, and of these 379 were considered as clinically relevant due to their potential harm. The area with the highest number of MEs was PICU (n = 867). The ME rate was > 50% in all pediatric critical care services and PICU had the highest ME/patient index (13.1). The most frequent MEs were use of abbreviations (50.9%) and wrong speed rate of administration (11.4%), and only 11.7% of the total drugs were considered as ideal medication orders.

conclusionClinically relevant medication errors can range from mild skin reactions to severe conditions that place the patient's life at risk. The role of pharmacists through the detection and timely intervention during the prescription and other stages of the medication use process can improve drug safety in pediatric critical care services.

Indexed as

Medication ErrorsPrescriptionsChildCritical CareCross-Sectional StudiesHospitals, PublicHumansInfant, NewbornMexicoDispensing errorMedication errorsPediatric critical carePediatric emergencyPrescription error

Identifiers

PMID33278900
PMCPMC7718655
OpenAlexW3111844877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.