Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33278857›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical practice2021

While studies on COVID-19 vaccine is ongoing, the public's thoughts and attitudes to the future COVID-19 vaccine.

Büşra Akarsu, Dilara Canbay Özdemir, Duygu Ayhan Baser, Hilal Aksoy, İzzet Fidancı, Mustafa Cankurtaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 105 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
105citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

105 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Implications for COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A systematic review.Journal of infection and public health · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

45 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Büşra AkarsuFamily Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Dilara Canbay ÖzdemirFamily Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Duygu Ayhan BaserFamily Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5153-2184
Hilal AksoyFamily Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3330-9317
İzzet FidancıFamily Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9848-8697
Mustafa CankurtaranInternal medicine Department/Division of Geriatrics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn this study, we aim to investigate the thoughts and attitudes of individuals towards the future COVID-19 vaccine.

methodsThis descriptive study was carried out on the web between 10/06/2020 and 10/07/2020. The sample constitutes all individuals above 18 years of age using social media and smartphone. The e-survey form was shared by the researchers via the web for a month, and those who completed the survey were included in the study and formed the sample of the research.

resultsSeven-hundred and fifty-nine people participated. 49.7% of the participants stated to be vaccinated; 38.4% of them stated to be vaccinated their children against COVID-19; if the vaccine for COVID-19 is developed. The request for the COVID-19 vaccine had relationship with gender, occupation, health insurance, anxiety level, having children and willing to get vaccinated for their children. "Afraid of the side effects of vaccine", "don't think it can be reliable as it will be a new vaccine" and "COVID-19 infection is a biological weapon and the vaccine will serve those who produce this virus" were the most common reasons for rejection of vaccine.

conclusionIn our study, afraid of the side effects of vaccine and not thinking it can be reliable as it will be a new vaccine are the most reasons of indecision and rejection about COVID 19 vaccine. In order for the future COVID 19 vaccination campaign to not fail, media, politicians and healthcare professionals should closely follow the vaccination development processes, inform the public transparently and consider public's concerns.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesPublic OpinionAdultFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID33278857
PMCPMC7883065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.