Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33278737›Full record

ArticleVirology2021

Analytical and clinical comparison of Viasure (CerTest Biotec) and 2019-nCoV CDC (IDT) RT-qPCR kits for SARS-CoV2 diagnosis.

Byron Freire-Paspuel, Patricio Vega-Mariño, Alberto Velez, Marilyn Cruz, Franklin Perez, Miguel Angel Garcia-Bereguiain

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Virology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidelines on the Diagnosis of COVID-19: Molecular Diagnostic Testing (December 2023).Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Guideline
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. A Critical Review of the CRISPR-Cas Technology in the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Variants.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Equitable distribution of SARS-CoV-2 tests.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Performance verification of five commercial RT-qPCR diagnostic kits for SARS-CoV-2.Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Byron Freire-PaspuelOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador.
Patricio Vega-MariñoAgencia de Regulación y Control de La Bioseguridad y Cuarentena para Galápagos, Puerto Ayora, Ecuador.
Alberto VelezAgencia de Regulación y Control de La Bioseguridad y Cuarentena para Galápagos, Puerto Ayora, Ecuador.
Marilyn CruzAgencia de Regulación y Control de La Bioseguridad y Cuarentena para Galápagos, Puerto Ayora, Ecuador.
Franklin PerezOneLabt, Santa Elena, Ecuador.
Miguel Angel Garcia-BereguiainOne Health Research Group, Universidad de Las Americas, Quito, Ecuador. Electronic address: magbereguiain@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral RT-qPCR kits are available for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis, some of them with Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) by FDA, but most of them lacking of proper evaluation studies due to covid19 emergency.

objectiveWe evaluated Viasure RT-qPCR kit (CerTest Biotec, Spain) for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis using FDA EUA 2019-nCoV CDC kit (IDT, USA) as a gold standard.

resultsAlthough we found the lack of RNA quality control probe as the main limitation for the Viasure kit, the sensitivity was 91.9% and the specificity was 100%. The limit of detection (LOD) was 2000 copies/mL and 1000 copies/mL for Viasure and IDT kits, respectively.

conclusionsViasure RT-qPCR kit is a reliable tool for SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis but improvement of an alternative RT-qPCR reaction for RNA extraction quality control as RNaseP is recommended.

Indexed as

Reagent Kits, DiagnosticSARS-CoV-2COVID-19COVID-19 TestingHumansLimit of DetectionReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionViral LoadReagent Kits, Diagnostic

Identifiers

PMID33278737
PMCPMC7673214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.