Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33278632›Full record

ArticleComputers in biology and medicine2021

A method to predict ventricular fibrillation shock outcome during chest compressions.

Jason Coult, Thomas D Rea, Jennifer Blackwood, Peter J Kudenchuk, Chenguang Liu, Heemun Kwok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers in biology and medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jason CoultDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Progress in Resuscitation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. Electronic address: jasonc4@uw.edu.
Thomas D ReaDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Progress in Resuscitation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; King County Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer BlackwoodCenter for Progress in Resuscitation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; King County Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Peter J KudenchukDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Center for Progress in Resuscitation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; King County Emergency Medical Services, Public Health, Seattle & King County, Seattle, WA, USA.
Chenguang LiuPhilips Emergency Care & Resuscitation, Bothell, WA, USA.
Heemun KwokCenter for Progress in Resuscitation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

UW Center for Translational Muscle Research (Overall Application)P30AR074990 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Jennifer Michelle Davis, DANIEL RAFTERY · 2019 to 2026
$7.5M
Bioengineering Cardiovascular Training GrantT32EB001650 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI REGNIER, MICHAEL · 2004 to 2019
$3.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS P30 AR074990NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB001650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOut-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF) cardiac arrest is a leading cause of death. Quantitative analysis of the VF electrocardiogram (ECG) can predict patient outcomes and could potentially enable a patient-specific, guided approach to resuscitation. However, VF analysis during resuscitation is confounded by cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) artifact in the ECG, challenging continuous application to guide therapy throughout resuscitation. We therefore sought to design a method to predict VF shock outcomes during CPR.

methodsStudy data included 4577 5-s VF segments collected during and without CPR prior to defibrillation attempts in N = 1151 arrest patients. Using training data (460 patients), an algorithm was designed to predict the VF shock outcomes of defibrillation success (return of organized ventricular rhythm) and functional survival (Cerebral Performance Category 1-2). The algorithm was designed with variable-frequency notch filters to reduce CPR artifact in the ECG based on real-time chest compression rate. Ten ECG features and three dichotomous patient characteristics were developed to predict outcomes. These variables were combined using support vector machines and logistic regression. Algorithm performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to predict outcomes in validation data (691 patients).

resultsAUC (95% Confidence Interval) for predicting defibrillation success was 0.74 (0.71-0.77) during CPR and 0.77 (0.74-0.79) without CPR. AUC for predicting functional survival was 0.75 (0.72-0.78) during CPR and 0.76 (0.74-0.79) without CPR.

conclusionA novel algorithm predicted defibrillation success and functional survival during ongoing CPR following VF arrest, providing a potential proof-of-concept towards real-time guidance of resuscitation therapy.

Indexed as

Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationOut-of-Hospital Cardiac ArrestElectric CountershockElectrocardiographyHumansVentricular FibrillationAlgorithmCardiac arrestCardiopulmonary resuscitationDefibrillationElectrocardiogramMachine learningResuscitationVentricular fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID33278632
PMCPMC10860689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.