Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33278421›Full record

ArticleNeuropsychologia2021

Spatial direction comprehension in images, arrows, and words in two patients with posterior cortical atrophy.

Steven M Weisberg, Anjan Chatterjee

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Neuropsychologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steven M WeisbergDepartment of Psychology, University of Florida, 945 Center Dr., Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. Electronic address: stevenweisberg@ufl.edu.
Anjan ChatterjeeDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Transgenic Mouse Models of Tau PathologiesP01AG017586 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEE, VIRGINIA M · 2000 to 2021
$37.3M
Understanding Environmental Contributions to Heterogeneity in bvFTD.P01AG066597 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Lauren M Massimo · 2020 to 2026
$18.8M
Spreading Tau Pathology in Non-Amnestic Alzheimer's DiseaseR01AG054519 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Jeffrey S Phillips · 2018 to 2026
$7.4M
Figurative Language in Aphasic and Health ParticipantsR01DC012511 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI CHATTERJEE, ANJAN K · 2013 to 2017
$1.7M
Neural representations of spatial directions in language, schemas, and imagesF32DC015203 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI WEISBERG, STEVEN M · 2015 to 2018
$171k
NIA NIH HHS P01 AG017586NIA NIH HHS P01 AG066597NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054519NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC015203NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012511
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To successfully move through the world, the brain constructs spatial representations that situate the body within the environment. Communicating spatial directions poses specific challenges to this process, in part because the format through which the information is communicated must be interpreted to match the visual scene the navigator is viewing while traversing that space. For example, if a navigator needs to turn left to reach a goal, the information may be presented in the form of words ("turn left"), schemas (arrows pointing left), or images of the specific left turn. Previous research has suggested unique representations exist for spatial directions within and across modalities. Behavioral data reveal, for instance, that interpreting images seems to require spatial information, whereas words or schemas can be processed using a visual-matching strategy. In the current pre-registered study, we tested two patients with posterior cortical atrophy, who did not have spatial neglect, to determine whether they had general impairments interpreting spatial directions across formats, or specific impairments in particular formats. Our results are consistent with the specific impairment prediction, supporting the idea that interpreting spatial directions in images requires action-relevant spatial processing. We conducted single-case analyses for the patients we tested in comparison to a group of non-clinically diagnosed older adults. Of the two patients, one showed a classical dissociation between a color control task and spatial directions across all modalities. This patient also showed a classical dissociation between images (most impaired) and schemas, and between schemas and words (least impaired). Our findings lend support for a hypothesized hub in the spatial navigation network, which converts format-specific information into actionable spatial directions, and has implications for designing the built environment to optimize for spatial behavior.

Indexed as

ComprehensionNeurodegenerative DiseasesAgedAged, 80 and overAtrophyBrainFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSpace Perception6 maximum): spatial cognitionPosterior cortical atrophySpatial communicationSpatial navigation

Identifiers

PMID33278421
PMCPMC7855773
OpenAlexW3108552590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.