ArticleNeuropsychologia2021
Spatial direction comprehension in images, arrows, and words in two patients with posterior cortical atrophy.
Article in Neuropsychologia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Allocation of Space-Based Attention is Guided by Efficient Comprehension of Spatial Direction.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Getting LOST: A conceptual framework for supporting and enhancing spatial navigation in aging.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive scienceReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
To successfully move through the world, the brain constructs spatial representations that situate the body within the environment. Communicating spatial directions poses specific challenges to this process, in part because the format through which the information is communicated must be interpreted to match the visual scene the navigator is viewing while traversing that space. For example, if a navigator needs to turn left to reach a goal, the information may be presented in the form of words ("turn left"), schemas (arrows pointing left), or images of the specific left turn. Previous research has suggested unique representations exist for spatial directions within and across modalities. Behavioral data reveal, for instance, that interpreting images seems to require spatial information, whereas words or schemas can be processed using a visual-matching strategy. In the current pre-registered study, we tested two patients with posterior cortical atrophy, who did not have spatial neglect, to determine whether they had general impairments interpreting spatial directions across formats, or specific impairments in particular formats. Our results are consistent with the specific impairment prediction, supporting the idea that interpreting spatial directions in images requires action-relevant spatial processing. We conducted single-case analyses for the patients we tested in comparison to a group of non-clinically diagnosed older adults. Of the two patients, one showed a classical dissociation between a color control task and spatial directions across all modalities. This patient also showed a classical dissociation between images (most impaired) and schemas, and between schemas and words (least impaired). Our findings lend support for a hypothesized hub in the spatial navigation network, which converts format-specific information into actionable spatial directions, and has implications for designing the built environment to optimize for spatial behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.