Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277955›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2021

Predicting visual working memory with multimodal magnetic resonance imaging.

Yu Xiao, Ying Lin, Junji Ma, Jiehui Qian, Zijun Ke, Liangfang Li, Yangyang Yi, Jinbo Zhang, Cam-CAN, Zhengjia Dai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yu XiaoDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ying LinDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Junji MaDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jiehui QianDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Zijun KeDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Liangfang LiDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Yangyang YiDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Jinbo ZhangDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Cam-CANCambridge Centre for Ageing and Neuroscience (Cam-CAN), University of Cambridge and MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK.
Zhengjia DaiDepartment of Psychology, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1126-9895

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/H008217/1Medical Research Council MC-A060-5PR10Medical Research Council MC-A060-5PR60Wellcome Trust 107392/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The indispensability of visual working memory (VWM) in human daily life suggests its importance in higher cognitive functions and neurological diseases. However, despite the extensive research efforts, most findings on the neural basis of VWM are limited to a unimodal context (either structure or function) and have low generalization. To address the above issues, this study proposed the usage of multimodal neuroimaging in combination with machine learning to reveal the neural mechanism of VWM across a large cohort (N = 547). Specifically, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging features extracted from voxel-wise amplitude of low-frequency fluctuations, gray matter volume, and fractional anisotropy were used to build an individual VWM capacity prediction model through a machine learning pipeline, including the steps of feature selection, relevance vector regression, cross-validation, and model fusion. The resulting model exhibited promising predictive performance on VWM (r = .402, p < .001), and identified features within the subcortical-cerebellum network, default mode network, motor network, corpus callosum, anterior corona radiata, and external capsule as significant predictors. The main results were then compared with those obtained on emotional regulation and fluid intelligence using the same pipeline, confirming the specificity of our findings. Moreover, the main results maintained well under different cross-validation regimes and preprocess strategies. These findings, while providing richer evidence for the importance of multimodality in understanding cognitive functions, offer a solid and general foundation for comprehensively understanding the VWM process from the top down.

Indexed as

Cerebral CortexWhite MatterAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEmotional RegulationFemaleHumansIntelligenceMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMemory, Short-TermMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalfMRImachine learningMRImultimodal imagingworking memory

Identifiers

PMID33277955
PMCPMC7927291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.