Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277897›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical entomology2021

Oviposition-Site Selection of Phlebotomus papatasi (Diptera: Psychodidae) Sand Flies: Attraction to Bacterial Isolates From an Attractive Rearing Medium.

Madhavi L Kakumanu, Bahjat F Marayati, Coby Schal, Charles S Apperson, Gideon Wasserberg, Loganathan Ponnusamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical entomology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An oviposition pheromone, hexadecanoic acid, found on the eggs ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Luring the vector: A systematic review of sand fly attractants.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Spatial Bet Hedging in Sand Fly Oviposition: Factors Affecting Skip Oviposition inVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madhavi L KakumanuDepartment of Entomology and Plath Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Bahjat F MarayatiDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.
Coby SchalDepartment of Entomology and Plath Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Charles S AppersonDepartment of Entomology and Plath Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
Gideon WasserbergDepartment of Biology, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, Greensboro, NC.
Loganathan PonnusamyDepartment of Entomology and Plath Pathology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.

Funding

Oviposition attractants for sand fly controlR01AI123327 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA GREENSBORO · PI WASSERBERG, GIDEON · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI123327
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phlebotomine sand flies are worldwide vectors of Leishmania parasites as well as other bacterial and viral pathogens. Due to the variable impact of traditional vector control practices, a more ecologically based approach is needed. The goal of this study was to isolate bacteria from the most attractive substrate to gravid Phlebotomus papatasi Scopoli sand flies and determine the role of bacterial volatiles in the oviposition attractancy of P. papatasi using behavioral assays. We hypothesized that gravid sand flies are attracted to bacterially derived semiochemical cues associated with breeding sites. Bacteria were isolated from a larvae-conditioned rearing medium, previously shown to be highly attractive to sand flies. The isolated bacteria were identified by amplifying and sequencing 16S rDNA gene fragments, and 12 distinct bacterial species were selected for two-choice olfactometer bioassays. The mix of 12 bacterial isolates elicited strong attraction at the lower concentration of 107 cells per ml and significant repellence at a high concentration of 109 cells per ml. Three individual isolates (SSI-2, SSI-9, and SSI-11) were particularly attractive at low doses. In general, we observed dose-related effects, with some bacterial isolates stimulating negative and some positive dose-response curves in sand fly attraction. Our study confirms the important role of saprophytic bacteria, gut bacteria, or both, in guiding the oviposition-site selection behavior of sand flies. Identifying the specific attractive semiochemical cues that they produce could lead to development of an attractive lure for surveillance and control of sand flies.

Indexed as

OvipositionPhlebotomusAnimalsAppetitive BehaviorBacteriaCulture MediaFemaleMicrobiotaVolatile Organic CompoundsCulture MediaVolatile Organic CompoundsdoseleishmaniasisPhlebotomus papatasiresponse bioassaysand fliessemiochemical

Identifiers

PMID33277897
PMCPMC7954094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.