Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277781›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2021

Prospective evaluation and refinement of an S-1 dosage formula based on renal function for clinical application.

Masashi Takeuchi, Chiyo K Imamura, Eisuke Booka, Hiroya Takeuchi, Takuro Mizukami, Takeshi Kawakami, Taro Funakoshi, Kazushige Wakuda, Yu Aoki, Yasuo Hamamoto and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Usefulness of an S-1 dosage formula: an exploratory analysis of randomized clinical trial (JCOG1001).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Anticancer drug therapy for patients with renal dysfunction.International journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Masashi TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Chiyo K ImamuraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2907-847X
Eisuke BookaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiroya TakeuchiDepartment of Surgery, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Shizuoka, Japan.
Takuro MizukamiDepartment of Clinical Oncology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan.
Takeshi KawakamiDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Taro FunakoshiDepartment of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Kazushige WakudaDivision of Thoracic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6369-2388
Yu AokiDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuo HamamotoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5737-122X
Minoru KitagoDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirofumi KawakuboDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Narikazu BokuDepartment of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke TanigawaraDepartment of Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yuko KitagawaDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP17K08961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with impaired renal function, S-1-related toxicities increase due to higher exposure of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). Our previous pharmacokinetic study in 16 cancer patients with various renal functions developed an S-1 dosage formula based on individual creatinine clearance (CLcr) and body surface area (BSA). To evaluate and refine the formula, this prospective study was conducted. Thirty-three patients with various renal functions received S-1 for 4 weeks at doses determined by the nomogram derived from the previously developed formula. A series of blood samples were collected after the first dose to calculate the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) of 5-FU. Thirty patients with BSA of 1.14-1.84 m

Indexed as

AgedAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug CombinationsFemaleFluorouracilHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNomogramsOxonic AcidRenal InsufficiencyTegafurAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDrug CombinationsFluorouracilOxonic AcidS 1 (combination)Tegafurdosage formulanomogramrenal functionS-1target AUC of 5-FU

Identifiers

PMID33277781
PMCPMC7894007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.