Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277768›Full record

ArticleBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2021

Aetiological testing compared with syndromic management for sexually transmitted infections in HIV-infected pregnant women in South Africa: a non-randomised prospective cohort study.

Rph Peters, J D Klausner, L de Vos, U D Feucht, A Medina-Marino

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effect of antenatalSexually transmitted infections · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Significant Associations betweenInfectious diseases in obstetrics and gynecology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Rph PetersResearch Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London, South Africa.
J D KlausnerDivision of Infectious Diseases: Global Health, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
L de VosResearch Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London, South Africa.
U D FeuchtDepartment of Paediatrics, Research Centre for Maternal, Fetal, Newborn and Child Health Care Strategies, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
A Medina-MarinoResearch Unit, Foundation for Professional Development, East London, South Africa.
Foundation for Professional Development · ZADesmond Tutu HIV Foundation · ZALos Angeles County Department of Public Health · USUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

Clinical Study of STI Screening to Prevent Adverse Birth and Newborn OutcomesR01AI149339 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI KLAUSNER, JEFFREY DAVID, MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2020 to 2024
$4.3M
Pilot Study of STI Screening and Treatment for PMTCTR21HD084274 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI KLAUSNER, JEFFREY DAVID, MEDINA-MARINO, ANDREW · 2015 to 2016
$352k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development R21HD084274National Institute for Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI149339NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD084274U.S. President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief AID 674-A-12-00017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo measure the frequencies of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and adverse pregnancy outcomes among women receiving either aetiological testing or syndromic management for STIs.

designNon-randomised prospective cohort study.

settingPrimary healthcare facilities in Tshwane, South Africa. POPULATION: HIV-infected pregnant women attending antenatal care services.

methodsParticipants were enrolled to receive aetiological testing using Xpert® CT/NG and Xpert® TV assays or standard syndromic management. Outcome data were collected at the postnatal care visit (≤30 days from delivery) and from maternity records. Enrolment gestational age-adjusted relative risk (aRR) was calculated.

main outcome measuresSTI prevalence at postnatal visit, and frequency of adverse pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth, low birthweight).

resultsWe enrolled 841 women. The prevalence of any STI at baseline was 40%; Chlamydia trachomatis 30%, Neisseria gonorrhoeae 5.6%, Trichomonas vaginalis 20%. The prevalence of STIs at postnatal care was lower among those receiving aetiological testing compared with those receiving syndromic management (14% versus 23%; aRR 0.61; 95% CI 0.35-1.05). No difference was observed between study groups for frequency of preterm birth (23% versus 23%; aRR 1.2, 95% CI 0.81-1.8) and low birth weight (15% versus 13%; aRR 1.1, 95% CI 0.66-1.7).

conclusionsAetiological testing provides an effective intervention to reduce the high burden of STIs in pregnant women in South Africa; however, the optimal implementation strategy remains to be determined. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: Aetiological testing effectively reduces the burden of sexually transmitted infections in pregnancy.

Indexed as

AdultCoinfectionFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, PrematurePostnatal CarePregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousPregnancy OutcomePrenatal CarePrevalenceProspective StudiesSexually Transmitted DiseasesSouth AfricaAetiological testingHIVlow birthweightpregnancypreterm birthsexually transmitted infectionssyndromic managementXpert®

Identifiers

PMID33277768
PMCPMC8175473
OpenAlexW3108694264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.