Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277682›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2021

Influence of COVID-19 confinement measures on appendectomies in Germany-a claims data analysis of 9797 patients.

Matthias Maneck, Christian Günster, Hans-Joachim Meyer, Claus-Dieter Heidecke, Udo Rolle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Mis-Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  16. Acute appendicitis during the COVID-19 pandemic-changes in incidence and clinical presentation but not in patients' outcome.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. The decrease of non-complicated acute appendicitis and the negative appendectomy rate during pandemic.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2021
    Article
  20. [Impact of COVID-19 on elective and emergency colorectal surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Matthias ManeckAOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
Christian GünsterAOK Research Institute (WIdO), Berlin, Germany.
Hans-Joachim MeyerGerman Society of Surgery, Berlin, Germany.
Claus-Dieter HeideckeDepartment of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Udo RolleGoethe-University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery and Paediatric Urology, Frankfurt, Germany. udo.rolle@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1268-6092
Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCOVID-19 pandemic had multiple influences on the social, industrial, and medical situation in all affected countries. Measures of obligatory medical confinement were suspensions of scheduled non-emergent surgical procedures and outpatients' clinics as well as overall access restrictions to hospitals and medical practices. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess if the obligatory confinement (lockdown) had an effect on the number of appendectomies (during and after the period of lockdown).

methodsThis retrospective study was based on anonymized nationwide administrative claims data of the German Local General Sickness Fund (AOK). Patients admitted for diseases of the appendix (ICD-10: K35-K38) or abdominal and pelvic pain (ICD-10: R10) who underwent an appendectomy (OPS: 5-470) were included. The study period included 6 weeks of German lockdown (16 March-26 April 2020) as well as 6 weeks before (03 February-15 March 2020) and after (27 April-07 June 2020). These periods were compared to the respective one in 2018 and 2019.

resultsThe overall number of appendectomies was significantly reduced during the lockdown time in 2020 compared to that in 2018 and 2019. This decrease affects only appendectomies due to acute simple (ICD-10: K35.30, K35.8) and non-acute appendicitis (ICD-10: K36-K38, R10). Numbers for appendectomies in acute complex appendicitis remained unchanged. Female patients and in the age group 1-18 years showed the strongest decrease in number of cases.

conclusionThe lockdown in Germany resulted in a decreased number of appendectomies. This affected mainly appendectomies in simple acute and non-acute appendicitis, but not complicated acute appendicitis. The study gives no evidence that the confinement measures resulted in a deterioration of medical care for appendicitis.

Indexed as

Communicable Disease ControlAdolescentAdultAgedAppendectomyAppendicitisChildChild, PreschoolCOVID-19FemaleGermanyHumansIncidenceInfantInsurance Claim ReviewLaparoscopyAdministrative claims dataAppendectomyConfinementCOVID 19 pandemicLockdown

Identifiers

PMID33277682
PMCPMC7717103
OpenAlexW3110571812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.