Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277662›Full record

Observational studyHeart and vessels2021

Usefulness of dual-axis rotational coronary angiography in primary percutaneous coronary intervention for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Hideaki Suwa, Yota Koyabu, Taichi Adachi, Akira Kawai, Kazuhiko Kotani, Shigeru Toyoda, Teruo Inoue, Toru Kato

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Heart and vessels, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hideaki SuwaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center, 1-10-37, Nakatomatsuri, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 320-8580, Japan. hideaki.suwa.wwl@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3631-0070
Yota KoyabuDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center, 1-10-37, Nakatomatsuri, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 320-8580, Japan.
Taichi AdachiDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center, 1-10-37, Nakatomatsuri, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 320-8580, Japan.
Akira KawaiDepartment of Radiology, National Hospital Organization Tochigi Medical Center, Utsunomiya, Tochigi, Japan.
Kazuhiko KotaniDivision of Community and Family Medicine, Center for Community Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
Shigeru ToyodaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Teruo InoueDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.
Toru KatoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Mibu, Tochigi, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several studies have shown that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) reduces contrast medium volume and radiation exposure compared to conventional coronary angiography (CCA). However, there are no studies comparing the safety and usefulness of DARCA in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of DARCA on contrast medium volume, radiation exposure, time course of treatment, and adverse events in primary PCI for patients with STEMI. A total of 82 patients undergoing primary PCI were included in this study. Subjects were propensity matched to 41 patients in the CCA group and 41 in the DARCA group. Data were retrospectively collected from in-patient medical records and the contrast medium volume and radiation exposure (dose-area product, DAP) during the PCI procedure was compared between the two groups. Contrast medium volume [100.0 (82.5-115.0) vs 110 (102.5-127.5) ml, p = 0.018, r = 0.26] and DAP [113.4 (74.3-141.1) vs 138.1 (100.5-194.7) Gy cm

Indexed as

ElectrocardiographyAgedCoronary AngiographyCoronary VesselsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMalePercutaneous Coronary InterventionRetrospective StudiesST Elevation Myocardial InfarctionSurgery, Computer-AssistedTreatment OutcomeContrast mediumPrimary percutaneous coronary interventionRadiation exposureRotational coronary angiographyST-elevation myocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID33277662
PMCPMC8032619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.