Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277611›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Comparing cefotaxime and ceftriaxone in combating meningitis through nose-to-brain delivery using bio/chemoinformatics tools.

Rania M Hathout, Sherihan G Abdelhamid, Ghadir S El-Housseiny, Abdelkader A Metwally

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rania M HathoutDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, African Union Organization St., Cairo, 11566, Egypt. r_hathout@yahoo.com.
Sherihan G AbdelhamidDepartment of Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Ghadir S El-HousseinyDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
Abdelkader A MetwallyDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Industrial Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ain Shams University, African Union Organization St., Cairo, 11566, Egypt.
Ain Shams University · EGKuwait University · KW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bio/chemoinformatics tools can be deployed to compare antimicrobial agents aiming to select an efficient nose-to-brain formulation targeting the meningitis disease by utilizing the differences in the main structural, topological and electronic descriptors of the drugs. Cefotaxime and ceftriaxone were compared at the formulation level (by comparing the loading in gelatin and tripalmitin matrices as bases for the formation of nanoparticulate systems), at the biopharmaceutical level (through the interaction with mucin and the P-gp efflux pumps) and at the therapeutic level (through studying the interaction with S. pneumoniae bacterial receptors). GROMACS v4.6.5 software package was used to carry-out all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. Higher affinity of ceftriaxone was observed compared to cefotaxime on the investigated biopharmaceutical and therapeutic macromolecules. Both drugs showed successful docking on mucin, P-gp efflux pump and S. pneumoniae PBP1a and 2b; but ceftriaxone showed higher affinity to the P-gp efflux pump proteins and higher docking on mucin. Ceftriaxone showed less out-of-matrix diffusion and higher entrapment on the gelatin and the tripalmitin matrices. Accordingly, Ceftriaxone gelatin nanospheres or tripalmitin solid lipid nanoparticles may pose a more feasible and efficient nose-to-brain formulation targeting the meningitis disease compared to the cefotaxime counterparts.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBrainCefotaximeCeftriaxoneCheminformaticsGelatinMolecular Dynamics SimulationMucinsSoftwareTriglyceridesAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefotaximeCeftriaxoneGelatinMucinsTriglyceridestripalmitin

Identifiers

PMID33277611
PMCPMC7718871
OpenAlexW3109477231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.