Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277579›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Increasing prosocial behavior and decreasing selfishness in the lab and everyday life.

Andrew T Gloster, Marcia T B Rinner, Andrea H Meyer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew T GlosterDivision of Clinical Psychology and Intervention Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62 A, 4055, Basel, Switzerland. andrew.gloster@unibas.ch.
Marcia T B RinnerDivision of Clinical Psychology and Intervention Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Missionsstrasse 62 A, 4055, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea H MeyerDivision of Clinical Psychology & Epidemiology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
University of Basel · CH

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation PP00P1_163716/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tension between selfishness and prosocial behavior is crucial to understanding many social interactions and conflicts. Currently little is known how to promote prosocial behaviors, especially in naturally occurring relationships outside the laboratory. We examined whether a psychological micro-intervention would promote prosocial behaviors in couples. Across two studies, we randomized dyads of couples to a micro-intervention (15 min), which increased prosocial behaviors by 28% and decreased selfish behaviors by 35% a week later in behavioral games in a dose-response manner. Using event sampling methodology, we further observed an increase in prosocial behaviors across one week that was most pronounced in participants who received the intervention. These results from the laboratory and everyday life are important for researchers interested in prosocial behavior and selfishness and have practical relevance for group interactions.

Indexed as

AltruismEthicsSocial BehaviorSocial ValuesAdolescentAdultAgedFamily CharacteristicsFemaleGames, ExperimentalHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychosocial InterventionRandom AllocationReward

Identifiers

PMID33277579
PMCPMC7718232
OpenAlexW3109101351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.