Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277486›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

3D projection electrophoresis for single-cell immunoblotting.

Samantha M Grist, Andoni P Mourdoukoutas, Amy E Herr

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Single-Cell Protein Assays in Context: From 2D to 3D and In Situ Analysis.Annual review of analytical chemistry (Palo Alto, Calif.) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Intriguing Landscape of Single-Cell Protein Analysis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha M GristDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7451-0538
Andoni P MourdoukoutasDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Amy E HerrDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, USA. aeh@berkeley.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-6906-2985
Berkeley College · USUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

Advanced Cancer Classification via Single-Cell Electrophoretic CytopathologyR33CA225296 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI HERR, AMY ELIZABETH · 2017 to 2017
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R33 CA225296
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunoassays and mass spectrometry are powerful single-cell protein analysis tools; however, interfacing and throughput bottlenecks remain. Here, we introduce three-dimensional single-cell immunoblots to detect both cytosolic and nuclear proteins. The 3D microfluidic device is a photoactive polyacrylamide gel with a microwell array-patterned face (xy) for cell isolation and lysis. Single-cell lysate in each microwell is "electrophoretically projected" into the 3

Indexed as

AlgorithmsCell Line, TumorCytosolDiffusionElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelFinite Element AnalysisHumansImmunoblottingMicrofluidic Analytical TechniquesNuclear ProteinsProteinsSingle-Cell AnalysisNuclear ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID33277486
PMCPMC7718224
OpenAlexW3108086436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.