Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277427›Full record

ArticleNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation2021

Mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors in progressive MS: Two-year follow-up of a phase I study.

Violaine K Harris, James W Stark, Sophia Yang, Shayna Zanker, John Tuddenham, Saud A Sadiq

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase I
In one paragraph

Article in Neurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01933802 (Phase 1 Safety Study of Autologous Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Neural Progenitor Cells), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01933802 phase1completednot on this map

Phase 1 Safety Study of Autologous Bone Marrow-derived Mesenchymal Stem Cell-derived Neural Progenitor Cells (MSC-NP), Expanded Ex Vivo, Administered Intrathecally in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorTisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New YorkRan2014 to 2017Enrolled20ConditionsMultiple SclerosisArmsintrathecal administration of autologous MSC-NP
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Pathways to cures for multiple sclerosis: A research roadmap.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Stem Cell Therapies for Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Violaine K HarrisFrom the Tisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New York.ORCID 0000-0002-3057-3059
James W StarkFrom the Tisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New York.
Sophia YangFrom the Tisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New York.
Shayna ZankerFrom the Tisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New York.
John TuddenhamFrom the Tisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New York.
Saud A SadiqFrom the Tisch Multiple Sclerosis Research Center of New York. ssadiq@tischms.org.
Tisch Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the long-term safety and efficacy of repeated intrathecal (IT) administration of autologous mesenchymal stem cell-derived neural progenitors (MSC-NPs) in patients with progressive MS by evaluating subjects 2 years after treatment.

methodsTwenty subjects were enrolled as part of a phase I, open-label single-arm study of 3 IT injections of MSC-NPs spaced 3 months apart. Subjects were evaluated for adverse events and disability outcomes including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and the timed 25-foot walk (T25FW). Long-term evaluation was conducted 2 years after the third treatment. CSF was collected before and 3 months after treatment.

resultsEighteen of the 20 study participants completed the full 2-year follow-up protocol. There were no long-term adverse events associated with repeated IT-MSC-NP treatment. Seven subjects showed sustained improvement in EDSS after 2 years, although the degree of improvement was not maintained in 5 of the subjects. Three of the 10 ambulatory subjects showed sustained improvement in the T25FW after 2 years. CSF biomarker analysis revealed a decrease in C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and an increase in interleukin 8, hepatocyte growth factor, and C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 12 (CXCL12) after treatment.

conclusionsSafety and efficacy of repeated IT-MSC-NP treatment was sustained for 2 years; however, the degree of disability reversal was not sustained in a subset of patients. CSF biomarkers altered in response to IT-MSC-NP treatment may reflect specific immunoregulatory and trophic mechanisms of therapeutic response in MS. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that for patients with progressive MS, IT administration of MSC-NPs is safe and effective. The study is rated Class IV because of the absence of a non-IT-MSC-NP-treated control group. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01933802.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChemokine CCL2Chemokine CXCL12FemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatocyte Growth FactorHumansInjections, SpinalInterleukin-8MaleMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMiddle AgedMultiple Sclerosis, Chronic ProgressiveNeural Stem CellsTransplantation, AutologousCCL2 protein, humanChemokine CCL2Chemokine CXCL12CXCL12 protein, humanHepatocyte Growth FactorHGF protein, humanInterleukin-8

Identifiers

PMID33277427
PMCPMC7738177
OpenAlexW3106915140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.