ArticleBMJ open quality2020
Assembly Line ICU: what the Long Shops taught us about managing surge capacity for COVID-19.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic literature review on public health and healthcare resources for pandemic preparedness planning.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- Interprofessional Team Staffing in U.S. Intensive Care Units.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Regulatory technology arrangements for hospital bed access during the COVID-19 pandemic: scope review.Cadernos de saude publica · 2025Article
- Incidence and Predictors of Healthcare-Associated Infections in Patients Admitted to a Temporary Intensive Care Unit during the COVID-19 Pandemic Waves: A Two-Year (2021-2023) Retrospective Cohort Study in Rome, Italy.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Transitioning to a virtual post-intensive care rehabilitation service in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: results of multidisciplinary focus-groups.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Theatre practitioners and organisational adaptive capacity in disaster response.Journal of perioperative practice · 2023Article
- Validity and Reliability of a Short Form of the Questionnaire for the Reflective Practice of Nursing Involving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Cross-Sectional Study.Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy) · 2023Article
- Management of patients at the hepatopancreatobiliary unit of a London teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Location selection of field hospitals amid COVID-19 considering effectiveness and fairness: A case study of Florida.International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR · 2023Article
- Resource utilization and preparedness within the COVID-19 pandemic in Tunisian medical intensive care units: A nationwide retrospective multicentre observational study.Journal of infection and public health · 2023Observational
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on critical care healthcare professionals' work practices and wellbeing: A qualitative study.Australian critical care : official journal of the Confederation of Australian Critical Care Nurses · 2023Article
- Strengthening the ICUs' human resource-related responses to Covid-19: A rapid review of the experience during the first year of public health emergency.The International journal of health planning and management · 2023Review
- Outcomes in Temporary ICUs Versus Conventional ICUs: An Observational Cohort of Mechanically Ventilated Patients With COVID-19-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Critical care explorations · 2022Article
- Comparison of clinicians' perceptions of the Recommended Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment (ReSPECT) before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Resuscitation plus · 2022Article
- Understanding the Intensive Care Unit Experience of Patients and Relatives at the End-of-Life During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic.Journal of patient experience · 2022Article
- A Narrative Review of Innovative Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020.International journal of public health · 2022Review
- Nurses' experiences of providing care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan: A qualitative study.International journal of mental health nursing · 2021Article
- Article
- Syndemics, Infodemics, and How the Severity of COVID-19 Was Aggravated by Our Maladapted Lifestyle and by the Political Handling of Public Health.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo safely expand and adapt the normal workings of a large critical care unit in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
methodsIn April 2020, UK health systems were challenged to expand critical care capacity rapidly during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic so that they could accommodate patients with respiratory and multiple organ failure. Here, we describe the preparation and adaptive responses of a large critical care unit to the oncoming burden of disease. Our changes were similar to the revolution in manufacturing brought about by 'Long Shops' of 1853 when Richard Garrett and Sons of Leiston started mass manufacture of traction engines. This innovation broke the whole process into smaller parts and increased productivity. When applied to COVID-19 preparations, an assembly line approach had the advantage that our ICU became easily scalable to manage an influx of additional staff as well as the increase in admissions. Healthcare professionals could be replaced in case of absence and training focused on a smaller number of tasks.
resultsCompared with the equivalent period in 2019, the ICU provided 30.9% more patient days (2599 to 3402), 1845 of which were ventilated days (compared with 694 in 2019, 165.8% increase) while time from first referral to ICU admission reduced from 193.8±123.8 min (±SD) to 110.7±76.75 min (±SD). Throughout, ICU maintained adequate capacity and also accepted patients from neighbouring hospitals. This was done by managing an additional 205 doctors (70% increase), 168 nurses who had previously worked in ICU and another 261 nurses deployed from other parts of the hospital (82% increase).Our large tertiary hospital ensured a dedicated non-COVID ICU was staffed and equipped to take regional emergency referrals so that those patients requiring specialist surgery and treatment were treated throughout the COVID-19 pandemic.
conclusionsWe report how the challenge of managing a huge influx of patients and redeployed staff was met by deconstructing ICU care into its constituent parts. Although reported from the largest colocated ICU in the UK, we believe that this offers solutions to ICUs of all sizes and may provide a generalisable model for critical care pandemic surge planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.