Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277288›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2020

External barriers for including parents of preterm infants in a randomised clinical trial in the neonatal intensive care unit in Sweden: a descriptive study.

Evalotte Mörelius, Emma Olsson, Charlotte Sahlén Helmer, Ylva Thernström Blomqvist, Charlotte Angelhoff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03004677 (Effect of Skin-to-skin Contact on Interaction and Parents' Sleep), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03004677 naterminatednot on this map

Effect of Skin-to-skin Contact on Interaction and Parents' Sleep

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2017 to 2019Enrolled11ConditionsSleep Quality, Communication, Stress ReactionArmsContinuous skin-to-skin contact, Standard Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Evalotte MöreliusDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden evalotte.morelius@liu.se.ORCID 0000-0002-3256-5407
Emma OlssonSchool of Health Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-5582-6147
Charlotte Sahlén HelmerDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Ylva Thernström BlomqvistDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Charlotte AngelhoffCrown Princess Victoria's Child and Youth Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-8630
Linköping University · SELinköping University Hospital · SEÖrebro University · SEUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPerforming randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in neonatal intensive care is challenging in many ways. While restrictive inclusion criteria or busy study protocols are obvious barriers, external barriers leading to termination of a study are seldom discussed. The aim of this study was to describe barriers for inclusion of families in neonatal intensive care in an RCT aiming to evaluate the effects of continuous skin-to-skin contact on mood and sleep quality in parents of preterm infants, as well as the quality of parent-infant interaction and salivary cortisol concentrations at the time of discharge.

designA descriptive study.

settingThree out of seven tertiary neonatal intensive care units in Sweden participated in a two-arm RCT that was terminated because of low inclusion rate.

participantsBefore termination of the study, 11 out of 242 families assessed for eligibility were included for participation.

resultsThe major barriers for inclusion in this RCT were external due to (1) lack of intensive care beds in the neonatal ward, causing medically stable infants to be transferred back to the referring hospital quicker than expected, (2) moving directly from the delivery room to a family room without passing an open bay intensive care room or (3) transferring from one neonatal ward to another with the same care level to increase availability of intensive care beds where needed. Other barriers were the inclusion criteria 'single-birth' and 'Swedish-speaking parent'.

conclusionsThe major barriers for including participants were external constituted by transferals between neonatal wards and cities due to lack of intensive care beds. This is a multifactorial issue related to organisational structures. However, since this affects the possibilities to perform research this study highlights some suggestions to consider when planning prospective intervention studies within a neonatal setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03004677.

Indexed as

Infant, PrematureIntensive Care Units, NeonatalHumansInfantInfant, NewbornParentsProspective StudiesSwedenClinical trialsneonatal intensive & critical careneonatologystatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID33277288
PMCPMC7722364
OpenAlexW3107645034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.