Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277285›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Randomised controlled trial of conditioning regimen for cord blood transplantation for adult myeloid malignancies comparing high-dose cytarabine/cyclophosphamide/total body irradiation with versus without G-CSF priming: G-CONCORD study protocol.

Seitaro Terakura, Takaaki Konuma, Masatsugu Tanaka, Yukiyasu Ozawa, Makoto Onizuka, Satoshi Nanno, Yasushi Onishi, Nobuyuki Aotsuka, Tadakazu Kondo, Toshiro Kawakita and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 13 institutions in 1 country.

Seitaro TerakuraDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan tseit@med.nagoya-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-1194-8046
Takaaki KonumaDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masatsugu TanakaDepartment of Hematology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Yukiyasu OzawaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Nagoya First Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Makoto OnizukaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Tokai University School of Medicine Graduate School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan.
Satoshi NannoDepartment of Hematology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Yasushi OnishiDepartment of Hematology and Rheumatology, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Nobuyuki AotsukaDivision of Hematology-Oncology, Japanese Red Cross Society Narita Hospital, Narita, Japan.
Tadakazu KondoDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Toshiro KawakitaDepartment of Hematology, National Hospital Organisation Kumamoto Medical Center, Kumamoto, Japan.
Jun KatoDivision of Hematology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Takeshi KobayashiDivision of Hematology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya NishidaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
Takuhiro YamaguchiDepartment of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Yachiyo KuwatsukaDepartment of Advanced Medicine, Nagoya University Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Satoshi TakahashiDepartment of Hematology/Oncology, The Institute of Medical Science The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Nagoya University · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPJapanese Red Cross Narita Hospital · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKeio University · JPKumamoto Medical Center · JPKyoto University · JPNagoya University Hospital · JPOsaka City University · JPTohoku University · JPTohoku University Hospital · JPTokai University · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA better long-term quality of life after umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT) is observed compared with transplants from other alternative donors, whereas graft failure and relapses after CBT are still major issues. To minimise graft failure and relapse after CBT, intensification of conditioning by the addition of high-dose cytosine arabinoside (CA) and concomitant continuous use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) are reported to convey a significantly better survival after CBT in some retrospective studies. To confirm the effect of G-CSF plus CA combination, in addition to the standard conditioning regimen, cyclophosphamide (CY)/total body irradiation (TBI), we design a randomised controlled study comparing CA/CY/TBI with versus without G-CSF priming (G-CSF combined conditioned cord blood transplantation [G-CONCORD] study). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase III study that aimed to compare G-CSF+CA/CY/TBI as a conditioning regimen for CBT with CA/CY/TBI. Patients with acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndrome, aged 16-55 years, are eligible. The target sample size is 160 and the registration period is 4 years. The primary endpoint is the 2-year disease-free survival rate after CBT. The secondary endpoints are overall survival, relapse, non-relapse mortality, acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, engraftment rate, time to neutrophil recovery, short-term adverse events, incidence of infections and causes of death.This study employs a single one-to-one web-based randomisation between the with-G-CSF versus without-G-CSF groups after patient registration. Combination of high-dose CA and CY/TBI in both groups is used for conditioning. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the central review board, Nagoya University Certified Review Board, after the enforcement of the Clinical Trials Act in Japan. The manuscripts presenting data from this study will be submitted for publication in quality peer-reviewed medical journals. Study findings will be disseminated via presentations at national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: UMIN000029947 and jRCTs041180059.

Indexed as

Cord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationAdolescentAdultCyclophosphamideCytarabineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansJapanMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRetrospective StudiesStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftCyclophosphamideCytarabineGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factorbone marrow transplantationleukaemiatransplant medicine

Identifiers

PMID33277285
PMCPMC7722372
OpenAlexW3107116236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.