Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277267›Full record

ArticleApplied and environmental microbiology2021

Engineering a Culturable

Katherine M Elston, Julie Perreau, Gerald P Maeda, Nancy A Moran, Jeffrey E Barrick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied and environmental microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine M ElstonDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA 78712, USA.
Julie PerreauDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA 78712, USA.
Gerald P MaedaDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA 78712, USA.
Nancy A MoranDepartment of Integrative Biology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA 78712, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-9769
Jeffrey E BarrickDepartment of Molecular Biosciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA 78712, USA jbarrick@cm.utexas.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-7358
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aphids are global agricultural pests and important models for bacterial symbiosis. To date, none of the native symbionts of aphids have been genetically manipulated, which limits our understanding of how they interact with their hosts.

Identifiers

PMID33277267
PMCPMC7851701
OpenAlexW3108009105

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.