Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33277149›Full record

ArticleNutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.)2021

Nutritional therapy for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Practical protocol from a single center highly affected by an outbreak of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Elena Formisano, Pasquale Di Maio, Cecilia Ivaldi, Elsa Sferrazzo, Lorenzina Arieta, Silvia Bongiovanni, Loredana Panizzi, Elena Valentino, Andrea Pasta, Marco Giudice and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena FormisanoNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Pasquale Di MaioDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Cecilia IvaldiNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Elsa SferrazzoNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Lorenzina ArietaNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Silvia BongiovanniNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Loredana PanizziNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Elena ValentinoNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Andrea PastaDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy.
Marco GiudiceDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy.
Stefania DemontisNutritional Unit, Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital, Sanremo, Italy. Electronic address: s.demontis@asl1.liguria.it.
Ospedale di Sanremo · ITUniversity of Genoa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) carries a high risk for malnutrition owing to the state of debilitation that results from acute respiratory failure symptoms. The aim of this study was to provide an approach to reduce the risk for malnutrition and improve patients' clinical outcomes.

methodsShort age-adjusted Nutritional Risk Screening was performed with 94 non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted to the Giovanni Borea Civil Hospital in Sanremo. Forty-nine patients in the ICU were considered at risk for malnutrition without screening and were fed with enteral nutrition plus supplemental parenteral nutrition. In the non-ICU setting, patients underwent a personalized nutritional protocol, considering their conditions, which consisted of a high-protein and high-calorie pureed diet, oral nutritional supplements, and/or artificial nutrition or other personalized nutritional path.

resultsThe nutritional treatment was well tolerated by the patients. Of the non-ICU patients, 19.1% died. They were mainly women, with higher body mass indices and older in age. Of the patients in the ICU, 53.1% died. Of the 94 non-ICU patients, 72 scored positive on at least one nutritional risk screening item (excluding age). Of the 94 non-ICU patients, 68 were >70 y of age. Non-ICU patients whose energy and protein needs were not met were older (P = 0.01) and had a higher death rate than patients whose needs were met (P < 0.001).

conclusionsThis protocol should not be considered as a guideline; rather, it is intended to report the clinical experience of a nutrition team in an Italian reference center for the treatment of patients with COVID-19. Nutritional strategies should be implemented to prevent worsening of clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AgedClinical ProtocolsCOVID-19Dietary SupplementsDisease OutbreaksFemaleHospitalizationHumansItalyMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentNutrition TherapyCOVID-19DysphagiaMalnutritionNutritional therapyOral nutritional supplementSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33277149
PMCPMC7645291
OpenAlexW3097267873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.