Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33276771›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

An evaluation of Alberta retina health service delivery in an office setting: a cross-sectional survey of patient experience.

Tyler Henry, Mathew Palakkamanil, Yazid N Al Hamarneh, Matthew T S Tennant

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tyler HenryDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, 400, 10924 107 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 0X5, Canada.
Mathew PalakkamanilDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, 400, 10924 107 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 0X5, Canada.
Yazid N Al HamarnehDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, 400, 10924 107 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 0X5, Canada.
Matthew T S TennantDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alberta, 400, 10924 107 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5H 0X5, Canada. mtennant@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8810-4821
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRetina sub-specialists provide much of the retina related eye care across Canada. In the province of Alberta, 18 retina sub-specialists work across six different offices. The purpose of this study was to assess the quality of care provided by Alberta retina sub-specialists in an office setting by administering a patient satisfaction survey. The results of this survey were provided to the same retina specialists to promote improvements in patient-centered health care delivery.

methodsA cross sectional patient satisfaction survey was performed using a thirty-part questionnaire developed in collaboration with the Physician Learning Program at the University of Alberta. The survey was modelled after other similar patient satisfaction surveys used in other areas of medicine. Patients from ten of the eighteen retina practices in Alberta participated in this survey. Topics of the survey included pre-appointment experience, physician-patient interactions and quality, comments/ feedback and patient demographics.

results214 randomly sampled patients completed the survey from three geographically separate office locations in Calgary and Edmonton. 90% of patients responded that their retina sub-specialist listened adequately and provided quality care in a timely manner. Patients felt that there could be improvements to accessibility to the clinic and reduced wait times, as well as in the pre-operative consent process. Including a more complete explanation of the procedure as well as the potential risks and benefits. Only 51% of patients felt that the risks of a potential surgery had been adequately explained to them. There was a statistically significant association found between overall satisfaction and lower wait times, understanding of procedural risks and time with, listening to and involving the patient in care. There were no correlations found with other demographics such as ethnicity, sex, distance traveled or age.

conclusionsThis patient satisfaction survey provided valuable patient care feedback to the retina sub-specialists of Alberta. The survey results will assist this group to improve the consent process and thereby improve patient centered health care delivery. We would recommend the distribution of this survey or other similar patient satisfaction questionnaire by retina sub-specialists to their patients to improve patient centered care in their clinics.

Indexed as

Health ServicesPatient SatisfactionAlbertaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPatient Outcome AssessmentRetinaAmbulatory/outpatient careHealth-care qualityPerformance measurement and improvementPhysician learningQuality improvementQuality of careSurvey research and questionnaire design

Identifiers

PMID33276771
PMCPMC7716462
OpenAlexW3110190489

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.