ArticleBMC family practice2020
Integrating nurse practitioners into primary care: policy considerations from a Canadian province.
Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Staff Experiences with the Implementation of Nurse Practitioner (NP)-led Clinics in New Brunswick, Canada.The Canadian journal of nursing research = Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres · 2025Article
- The Lived Experience of Contemporary Trainee Nursing Associates: The Evolution of the New Role as a Pathway to Nursing. A Phenomenological Study.International journal of nursing practice · 2025Article
- Nurses' experiences with virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study in primary care.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Practice pathways, education, and regulation influencing nurse practitioners' decision to provide primary care: a rapid scoping review.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Senior Nurse Manager Perceptions of Nurse Practitioner Integration: A Quantitative Study.Journal of nursing management · 2024Article
- Development of a Taxonomy of Policy Interventions for Integrating Nurse Practitioners into Health Systems.International journal of health policy and management · 2024Article
- Exploration of how primary care models influence job satisfaction among primary care providers during the COVID-19 pandemic in New Brunswick: a descriptive and comparative study.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Qualitative examination of collaboration in team-based primary care during the COVID-19 pandemic.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Integrating Nurse Practitioners Into Long-term Care: A Call for Action.The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP · 2022Article
- An Overview of Reviews on Interprofessional Collaboration in Primary Care: Barriers and Facilitators.International journal of integrated care · 2021Article
- Article
- Chronic Disease Management in a Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinic: An Interpretive Description Study.SAGE open nursingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of nurse practitioners (NPs) into primary care health teams has been an object of interest for policy makers seeking to achieve the goals of improving care, increasing access, and lowering cost. The province of Alberta in Canada recently introduced a policy aimed at integrating NPs into existing primary care delivery structures. This qualitative research sought to understand how that policy - the NP Support Program (NPSP) - was viewed by key stakeholders and to draw out policy lessons.
methodsFifteen semi-structured interviews with NPs and other stakeholders in Alberta's primary care system were conducted, recorded, transcribed and analyzed using the interpretive description method.
resultsStakeholders predominantly felt the NPSP would not change the status quo of limited practice opportunities and the resulting underutilization of primary care NPs in the province. Participants attributed low levels of NP integration into the primary care system to: 1) financial viability issues that directly impacted NPs, physicians, and primary care networks (PCNs); 2) policy issues related to the NPSP's reliance on PCNs as employers, and a requirement that NPs panel patients; and 3) governance issues in which NPs are not afforded sufficient authority over their role or how the key concept of 'care team' is defined and operationalized.
conclusionsIn general, stakeholders did not see the NPSP as a long-term solution for increasing NP integration into the province's primary care system. Policy adjustments that enable NPs to access funding not only from within but also outside PCNs, and modifications to allow greater NP input into how their role is utilized would likely improve the NPSP's ability to reach its goals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.