Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33276719›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2020

Trends in the process and outcome indicators of type 2 diabetes care: a cohort study from Eastern Finland, 2012-2017.

Marja-Leena Lamidi, Katja Wikström, Laura Inglin, Päivi Rautiainen, Hilkka Tirkkonen, Tiina Laatikainen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Time Trends of Body Mass Index and its Impact on Glycemic Control Among Finnish Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Type 2 diabetes medication and HbA1c levels in North Karelia Finland, 2013-2019.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2022
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marja-Leena LamidiInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland. marja-leena.lamidi@uef.fi.ORCID 0000-0003-4273-4005
Katja WikströmInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Laura InglinInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
Päivi RautiainenJoint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services, Tikkamäentie 16, FI-80210, Joensuu, Finland.
Hilkka TirkkonenJoint Municipal Authority for North Karelia Social and Health Services, Tikkamäentie 16, FI-80210, Joensuu, Finland.
Tiina LaatikainenInstitute of Public Health and Clinical Nutrition, University of Eastern Finland, PO Box 1627, FI-70211, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIEtelä-Karjalan sosiaali ja terveyspiiri · FI

Funding

Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland 312703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvidence-based guidelines include concrete treatment targets that can be used as process and outcome indicators in the evaluation of the quality of healthcare services and diabetes care. Quality improvement can be evaluated by monitoring longitudinal trends in the care indicators on the system level. The aim of this study is to describe trends in the processes and outcomes of care among people with type 2 diabetes in North Karelia, Finland.

methodsThe data consist of all adults with type 2 diabetes (identified from the EHRs using ICD-10 codes) who used primary or specialized care services in North Karelia during 2012-2017. The diabetes care was evaluated using the measurement activity, treatment levels, and the achievement of the treatment targets for HbA1c and LDL as care indicators. Logistic and linear models with generalized estimating equations were used to assess the differences between years, sexes, and age groups.

resultsThe proportion of patients with annual measurement varied between 75.8 and 78.1% for HbA1c and between 67.4 and 69.1% for LDL during a five-year follow-up. The changes in average levels were moderate: a 0.2% (2 mmol/mol) increase for HbA1c and a 0.1 mmol/l decrease for LDL. Anyway, the proportion of patients meeting the treatment target for HbA1c decreased from 72.7 to 67.3% (age-adjusted decrease: 5.7%p, 95% CI: 4.5-6.9) and for LDL it increased from 53.4 to 59.5% (age-adjusted increase: 5.6%p, 95% CI: 4.2-7.0). Women were measured and met the HbA1c target level more often compared with men. Conversely, men met the LDL target level more often than women, and the age-adjusted difference between sexes increased smoothly from 7.9%p to 11.7%p.

conclusionsThe achievements in relation to type 2 diabetes care in North Karelia are very good, but no major improvement was observed during follow-up. HbA1c levels had a rising tendency and LDL levels declining tendency indicating quality improvement in LDL management, but challenges in further improvement in glucose control.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AdultCohort StudiesFemaleFinlandGlycated HemoglobinHumansMaleQuality ImprovementGlycated HemoglobinCareElectronic health recordsHbA1cLDLTrendsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID33276719
PMCPMC7718663
OpenAlexW3107238931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.