ReviewGenes2020
The Dark Side of UV-Induced DNA Lesion Repair.
Review in Genes, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor suppressor syntaxin binding protein 1 regulates alternative splicing of DNA repair genes related to radiation sensitivity in breast cancer cells.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Epigenetic remodeling during UV exposure: high resolution analysis of histone post-translational modifications in a DNA binding protein 2 mutant model.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2026Article
- Influence of UV-C Irradiation Duration on Seed-Borne Fungal Suppression, Germination, and Seedling Development in Rice (Biology · 2026Article
- The transcriptomic and metabolomic mechanisms responsible for high medicinal quality in Dendrobium huoshanense under different cultivation techniques.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- WRKY Transcription Factors Modulate the Flavonoid Pathway ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Synergistic effects of retinol and retinyl palmitate in alleviating UVB-induced DNA damage and promoting the homologous recombination repair in keratinocytes.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- 1,8-Dihydroxynaphthalene (DHN) melanin provides unequal protection to black fungi Knufia petricola and Cryomyces antarcticus from UV-B radiation.Environmental microbiology reports · 2024Article
- The photoreactivation of 6 - 4 photoproducts in chloroplast and nuclear DNA depends on the amount of the Arabidopsis UV repair defective 3 protein.BMC plant biology · 2024Article
- Anti-aging Effects of Tirbanibulin 1% Ointment: A Real-Life Experience.Dermatology and therapy · 2024Article
- SUMO-Activating Enzyme Subunit 1 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis, Tumor Progression, and Radio-Resistance in Colorectal Cancer.Current issues in molecular biology · 2023Article
- Mechanisms of germ cell survival and plasticity in Caenorhabditis elegans.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022Review
- DNA damage response revisited: the p53 family and its regulators provide endless cancer therapy opportunities.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2022Review
- Immunotherapy for the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Potential Benefits and Challenges.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Genetic interaction of the histone chaperonemicroPublication biology · 2022Article
- Trehalose Protects Keratinocytes against Ultraviolet B Radiation by Activating Autophagy via Regulating TIMP3 and ATG9A.Oxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022Article
- Review
- Inflammatory Molecules Associated with Ultraviolet Radiation-Mediated Skin Aging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In their life cycle, plants are exposed to various unfavorable environmental factors including ultraviolet (UV) radiation emitted by the Sun. UV-A and UV-B, which are partially absorbed by the ozone layer, reach the surface of the Earth causing harmful effects among the others on plant genetic material. The energy of UV light is sufficient to induce mutations in DNA. Some examples of DNA damage induced by UV are pyrimidine dimers, oxidized nucleotides as well as single and double-strand breaks. When exposed to light, plants can repair major UV-induced DNA lesions, i.e., pyrimidine dimers using photoreactivation. However, this highly efficient light-dependent DNA repair system is ineffective in dim light or at night. Moreover, it is helpless when it comes to the repair of DNA lesions other than pyrimidine dimers. In this review, we have focused on how plants cope with deleterious DNA damage that cannot be repaired by photoreactivation. The current understanding of light-independent mechanisms, classified as dark DNA repair, indispensable for the maintenance of plant genetic material integrity has been presented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.