Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33276682›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Creating Structured Hydrogel Microenvironments for Regulating Stem Cell Differentiation.

David K Mills, Yangyang Luo, Anusha Elumalai, Savannah Esteve, Sonali Karnik, Shaomian Yao

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Bioink Formulation and Machine Learning-Empowered Bioprinting Optimization.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Advances in the Treatment of Partial-Thickness Cartilage Defect.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

David K MillsSchool of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71270, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6489-4520
Yangyang LuoMolecular Sciences and Nanotechnology, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71270, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3441-6621
Anusha ElumalaiSchool of Biological Sciences, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71270, USA.
Savannah EsteveCenter for Biomedical Engineering and Rehabilitation Science, Louisiana Tech University, Ruston, LA 71270, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5084-9075
Sonali KarnikDepartment of Mechanical and Energy Engineering, IUPUI, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA.
Shaomian YaoComparative Biomedical Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
Louisiana Tech University · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

Center for Dental, Oral, and Craniofacial Tissue and Organ Regeneration (C-DOCTOR)U24DE026914 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI CHAI, YANG, CHEN, YONG · 2017 to 2019
$12.0M
Louisiana Biomedical Research Network P20 GM103424-17.NIDCR NIH HHS U24 DE026914NIH HHS U24DE026914
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of distinct biomimetic microenvironments for regulating stem cell behavior and bioengineering human tissues and disease models requires a solid understanding of cell-substrate interactions, adhesion, and its role in directing cell behavior, and other physico-chemical cues that drive cell behavior. In the past decade, innovative developments in chemistry, materials science, microfabrication, and associated technologies have given us the ability to manipulate the stem cell microenvironment with greater precision and, further, to monitor effector impacts on stem cells, both spatially and temporally. The influence of biomaterials and the 3D microenvironment's physical and biochemical properties on mesenchymal stem cell proliferation, differentiation, and matrix production are the focus of this review chapter. Mechanisms and materials, principally hydrogel and hydrogel composites for bone and cartilage repair that create "cell-supportive" and "instructive" biomaterials, are emphasized. We begin by providing an overview of stem cells, their unique properties, and their challenges in regenerative medicine. An overview of current fabrication strategies for creating instructive substrates is then reviewed with a focused discussion of selected fabrication methods with an emphasis on bioprinting as a critical tool in creating novel stem cell-based biomaterials. We conclude with a critical assessment of the current state of the field and offer our view on the promises and potential pitfalls of the approaches discussed.

Indexed as

biomaterialsbiopolymersdifferentiationmicroenvironmentspolyelectrolytesstem cellssubstratestherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID33276682
PMCPMC7768466
OpenAlexW3107882150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.