ReviewInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Occupational Noise: Auditory and Non-Auditory Consequences.
Review in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is Noise Exposure Associated With Impaired Extended High Frequency Hearing Despite a Normal Audiogram? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Trends in hearingPooled it
- Management of Functional Hearing Difficulties Using Low-Gain Amplification: Case Reports on Auditory Processing Evaluations.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal patterns in air pollution and sound in Dhaka, Bangladesh.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Maternal occupational exposure to noise: prevalence, maternal effects and infant outcomes in the National Birth Defects Prevention Study, 1997-2011.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2025Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of the Time of Onset of Hearing Loss in Bus Drivers Following Exposure to Occupational Noise.Journal of audiology & otology · 2025Article
- Investigating the effects of co-exposure to noise and benzene on serum oxidative stress in rat.Toxicology reports · 2024Article
- Progress and recommendations of developing occupational exposure limits for noise-A systematic review.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Application ofHeliyon · 2024Article
- Trends in prevalence of hearing loss in adults in the USA 1999-2018: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Article
- Selected Exogenous (Occupational and Environmental) Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases in Military and Aviation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Reinvigorating engineered noise controls: a systems approach.International journal of occupational medicine and environmental health · 2023Article
- Health in the Skies: A Narrative Review of the Issues Faced by Commercial Airline Pilots.Cureus · 2023Review
- Noise Exposure in Palestinian Workers Without a Diagnosis of Hearing Impairment: Relations to Speech-Perception-in-Noise Difficulties, Tinnitus, and Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- Environmental Factors in the Rehabilitation Framework: Role of the One Health Approach to Improve the Complex Management of Disability.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Proposal of Combined Noise and Hand-Arm Vibration Index for Occupational Exposure: Application to a Study Case in the Olive Sector.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Review
- The α9α10 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: a compelling drug target for hearing loss?Expert opinion on therapeutic targets · 2022Review
- Sound thoughts: How understanding the teenage brain may help us look after their ears.Frontiers in integrative neuroscience · 2022Article
- Evaluation of hidden hearing loss in normal-hearing firearm users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Occupational noise exposure accounts for approximately 16% of all disabling hearing losses, but the true value and societal costs may be grossly underestimated because current regulations only identify hearing impairments in the workplace if exposures result in audiometric threshold shifts within a limited frequency region. Research over the past several decades indicates that occupational noise exposures can cause other serious auditory deficits such as tinnitus, hyperacusis, extended high-frequency hearing loss, and poor speech perception in noise. Beyond the audiogram, there is growing awareness that hearing loss is a significant risk factor for other debilitating and potentially life-threatening disorders such as cardiovascular disease and dementia. This review discusses some of the shortcomings and limitations of current noise regulations in the United States and Europe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.