ReviewCurrent opinion in structural biology2021
Toward complete rational control over protein structure and function through computational design.
Review in Current opinion in structural biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI Prediction of Structural Stability of Nanoproteins Based on Structures and Residue Properties by Mean Pooled Dual Graph Convolutional Network.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2025Article
- Nanomaterial-assisted CRISPR gene-engineering - A hallmark for triple-negative breast cancer therapeutics advancement.Materials today. Bio · 2022Review
- Site-wise Diversification of Combinatorial Libraries Using Insights from Structure-guided Stability Calculations.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022Article
- Protein Design with Deep Learning.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The grand challenge of protein design is a general method for producing a polypeptide with arbitrary functionality, conformation, and biochemical properties. To that end, a wide variety of methods have been developed for the improvement of native proteins, the design of ideal proteins de novo, and the redesign of suboptimal proteins with better-performing substructures. These methods employ informatic comparisons of function-structure-sequence relationships as well as knowledge-based evaluation of protein properties to narrow the immense protein sequence search space down to an enumerable and often manually evaluable set of structures that meet specified criteria. While arbitrary manipulation of protein-protein interfaces and molecular catalysis remains an unsolved problem, and no protein shape or behavior manipulation algorithm is universally applicable, the promising results thus far are a strong indicator that a general approach to the arbitrary manipulation of polypeptides is within reach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.