Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275889›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2021

Orientation Preference Maps in Microcebus murinus Reveal Size-Invariant Design Principles in Primate Visual Cortex.

Chun Lum Andy Ho, Robert Zimmermann, Juan Daniel Flórez Weidinger, Mario Prsa, Manuel Schottdorf, Sam Merlin, Tsuyoshi Okamoto, Koji Ikezoe, Fabien Pifferi, Fabienne Aujard and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Mouse lemurs.Nature methods · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The inevitable inequality of cortical columns.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Chun Lum Andy HoUniversity of Geneva, Department of Basic Neurosciences, Rue Michel Servet 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Robert ZimmermannUniversity of Geneva, Department of Basic Neurosciences, Rue Michel Servet 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Juan Daniel Flórez WeidingerMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Am Faßberg 17, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Mario PrsaUniversity of Geneva, Department of Basic Neurosciences, Rue Michel Servet 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland.
Manuel SchottdorfMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Am Faßberg 17, Göttingen 37077, Germany.
Sam MerlinMoran Eye Center, University of Utah, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 65 Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Tsuyoshi OkamotoKyushu University, Faculty of Arts and Science, 744 Motooka Nishi-ku, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan.
Koji IkezoeCenter for Information and Neural Networks, Osaka University and National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, 1-3 Yamadaoka Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan.
Fabien PifferiUMR CNRS/MNHN 7179, Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution, 1 Avenue du Petit Chateau, Brunoy 91800, France.
Fabienne AujardUMR CNRS/MNHN 7179, Mécanismes Adaptatifs et Evolution, 1 Avenue du Petit Chateau, Brunoy 91800, France.
Alessandra AngelucciMoran Eye Center, University of Utah, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 65 Mario Capecchi Drive, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA.
Fred WolfMax Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Am Faßberg 17, Göttingen 37077, Germany; Campus Institute for Dynamics of Biological Networks, Hermann-Rein-Straße 3, Göttingen 37075, Germany; Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience, Hermann-Rein-Straße 3, Göttingen 37075, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine, Hermann-Rein-Straße 3, Göttingen 37075, Germany; Institute for Dynamics of Complex Systems, Georg-August University, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, Göttingen 37073, Germany.
Daniel HuberUniversity of Geneva, Department of Basic Neurosciences, Rue Michel Servet 1, Geneva 1211, Switzerland. Electronic address: daniel.huber@unige.ch.

Funding

University of Utah, Core Vision Research GrantP30EY014800 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PAUL STEVEN BERNSTEIN · 2005 to 2026
$14.6M
Anatomical and functional organization of inter-areal feedback circuits in the visual cortex, and their impact on neuronal responsesR01EY026812 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANGELUCCI, ALESSANDRA · 2016 to 2025
$4.7M
Parallel pathways in visual cortex: functional connectivity of output pathways from area V1 to area V2R01EY019743 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI ANGELUCCI, ALESSANDRA · 2009 to 2020
$4.2M
Connectivity and function of inhibitory neurons in the primate visual cortexR01EY031959 · NEI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Alessandra Angelucci · 2020 to 2026
$3.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY014800NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019743NEI NIH HHS R01 EY026812NEI NIH HHS R01 EY031959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orientation preference maps (OPMs) are a prominent feature of primary visual cortex (V1) organization in many primates and carnivores. In rodents, neurons are not organized in OPMs but are instead interspersed in a "salt and pepper" fashion, although clusters of orientation-selective neurons have been reported. Does this fundamental difference reflect the existence of a lower size limit for orientation columns (OCs) below which they cannot be scaled down with decreasing V1 size? To address this question, we examined V1 of one of the smallest living primates, the 60-g prosimian mouse lemur (Microcebus murinus). Using chronic intrinsic signal imaging, we found that mouse lemur V1 contains robust OCs, which are arranged in a pinwheel-like fashion. OC size in mouse lemurs was found to be only marginally smaller compared to the macaque, suggesting that these circuit elements are nearly incompressible. The spatial arrangement of pinwheels is well described by a common mathematical design of primate V1 circuit organization. In order to accommodate OPMs, we found that the mouse lemur V1 covers one-fifth of the cortical surface, which is one of the largest V1-to-cortex ratios found in primates. These results indicate that the primate-type visual cortical circuit organization is constrained by a size limitation and raises the possibility that its emergence might have evolved by disruptive innovation rather than gradual change.

Indexed as

CheirogaleidaeAnimalsFemaleMaleModels, NeurologicalNeuronsOrientationPrimary Visual CortexMicrocebus Murinusmouse lemurorientation preference mapspinwheelsvisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID33275889
PMCPMC9026768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.