Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275636›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Biofilm-coated microbeads and the mouse ear skin: An innovative model for analysing anti-biofilm immune response in vivo.

Léo Sauvat, Aizat Iman Abdul Hamid, Christelle Blavignac, Jérôme Josse, Olivier Lesens, Pascale Gueirard

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Differential EarlyFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Léo SauvatLaboratoire Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR CNRS 6023, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Aizat Iman Abdul HamidLaboratoire Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR CNRS 6023, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Christelle BlavignacCentre Imagerie Cellulaire Santé, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Jérôme JosseCIRI-Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, Inserm, U1111, CNRS, UMR5308, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.
Olivier LesensLaboratoire Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR CNRS 6023, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Pascale GueirardLaboratoire Microorganismes: Génome et Environnement, Université Clermont Auvergne, UMR CNRS 6023, Clermont-Ferrand, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-4826
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to its ability to form biofilms, Staphylococcus aureus is responsible for an increasing number of infections on implantable medical devices. The aim of this study was to develop a mouse model using microbeads coated with S. aureus biofilm to simulate such infections and to analyse the dynamics of anti-biofilm inflammatory responses by intravital imaging. Scanning electron microscopy and flow cytometry were used in vitro to study the ability of an mCherry fluorescent strain of S. aureus to coat silica microbeads. Biofilm-coated microbeads were then inoculated intradermally into the ear tissue of LysM-EGFP transgenic mice (EGFP fluorescent immune cells). General and specific real-time inflammatory responses were studied in ear tissue by confocal microscopy at early (4-6h) and late time points (after 24h) after injection. The displacement properties of immune cells were analysed. The responses were compared with those obtained in control mice injected with only microbeads. In vitro, our protocol was capable of generating reproducible inocula of biofilm-coated microbeads verified by labelling matrix components, observing biofilm ultrastructure and confirmed in vivo and in situ with a matrix specific fluorescent probe. In vivo, a major inflammatory response was observed in the mouse ear pinna at both time points. Real-time observations of cell recruitment at injection sites showed that immune cells had difficulty in accessing biofilm bacteria and highlighted areas of direct interaction. The average speed of cells was lower in infected mice compared to control mice and in tissue areas where direct contact between immune cells and bacteria was observed, the average cell velocity and linearity were decreased in comparison to cells in areas where no bacteria were visible. This model provides an innovative way to analyse specific immune responses against biofilm infections on medical devices. It paves the way for live evaluation of the effectiveness of immunomodulatory therapies combined with antibiotics.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiofilmsCell MovementDisease Models, AnimalEar AuricleFemaleFluorescent DyesImmunity, InnateMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, ConfocalMicrospheresPhagocytesSilicon DioxideFluorescent DyesSilicon Dioxide

Identifiers

PMID33275636
PMCPMC7717515
OpenAlexW3110438002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.