ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2020
Construction and Validation of a 7-Immune Gene Model for Prognostic Assessment of Esophageal Carcinoma.
Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- AI in esophageal cancer: advances, barriers to clinical translation, and perspectives for digital health.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Integrated Machine Learning and Multi-Omics Identifies a Novel Molecular Signature for Improving the Prognosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Journal of hepatocellular carcinoma · 2026Article
- Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Esophageal Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Interferon signaling and ferroptosis in tumor immunology and therapy.NPJ precision oncology · 2024Article
- Integrated bioinformatics analysis for conducting a prognostic model and identifying immunotherapeutic targets in gastric cancer.BMC bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Construction a new nomogram prognostic model for predicting overall survival after radical resection of esophageal squamous cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- HSPA6 and its role in cancers and other diseases.Molecular biology reports · 2022Review
- Machine Learning for Future Subtyping of the Tumor Microenvironment of Gastro-Esophageal Adenocarcinomas.Cancers · 2021Review
- Identification, Verification and Pathway Enrichment Analysis of Prognosis-Related Immune Genes in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND We constructed a predictive risk model of esophageal carcinoma (EC) for prognostic prediction. MATERIAL AND METHODS Immune genes and the expression data were downloaded from the ImmPort database and The Cancer Genome Atlas database. Univariate analysis, Lasso regression, and multivariate analysis were applied to screen the ultimately included prognostic immune genes for the model based on the training cohort. Survival analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were applied to evaluate the model. The model was further validated in the testing and entire cohorts, and the clinical utility of the model and its ability to assess the subtypes of EC were evaluated in the entire cohort. RESULTS We detected 297 differentially expressed immune genes, including 241 upregulated genes and 56 downregulated genes in EC patients. Based on these genes, we developed a 7-immune gene model of EC, including HSPA6, S100A12, NOS2, DKK1, OSM, AR, and OXTR. The area under the curve (AUC) of the model at 1 year was 0.825. Similarly, the AUC values for the validating cohorts were 0.813 and 0.816, respectively. Pathological stage and risk score of the model were independent prognostic factors. This model was effective for both subtypes of EC. CONCLUSIONS We constructed a 7-gene model consisting of HSPA6, S100A12, NOS2, DKK1, OSM, AR, and OXTR. This risk model could be used for prognostic prediction of EC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.