Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275486›Full record

SynthesisJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2021

Prostate Radiotherapy With Adjuvant Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) Improves Metastasis-Free Survival Compared to Neoadjuvant ADT: An Individual Patient Meta-Analysis.

Daniel E Spratt, Shawn Malone, Soumyajit Roy, Scott Grimes, Libni Eapen, Scott C Morgan, Julia Malone, Julia Craig, Robert T Dess, William C Jackson and 17 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel E SprattDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Shawn MaloneThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Soumyajit RoyThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Scott GrimesThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Libni EapenThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Scott C MorganThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julia MaloneThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Julia CraigThe Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Robert T DessDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
William C JacksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Holly E HartmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Amar U KishanUniversity of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
Rohit MehraDepartment of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Samuel KaffenbergerDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Todd M MorganDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Zachery R ReichertDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Joshi J AlumkalDepartment of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Jeff MichalskiWashington University St Louis, St Louis, MO.
W Robert LeeDuke University, Durham, NC.
Thomas M PisanskyMayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Felix Y FengUCSF, San Francisco, CA.
William ShipleyMass General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Howard M SandlerCedars-Sinai Hospital, Los Angeles, CA.
Mathew J SchipperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Mack RoachUCSF, San Francisco, CA.
Yilun SunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI.
Colleen A F LawtonMedical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USOttawa Hospital · CAOttawa Hospital Research InstituteCedars-Sinai Medical Center · USDuke University · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

UM LAPs -UG1 GrantUG1CA233160 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ANNE F SCHOTT · 2019 to 2026
$5.4M
NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThere remains a lack of clarity regarding the influence of sequencing of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiotherapy (RT) on outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa). Herein, we evaluate the optimal sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT in localized PCa.

methodsMEDLINE (1966-2018), Embase (1982-2018), ClinicalTrials.gov, and conference proceedings (1990-2018) were searched to identify randomized trials evaluating the sequencing, but not duration, of ADT with RT. Two randomized phase III trials were identified, and individual patient data were obtained: Ottawa 0101 and NRG Oncology's Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. Ottawa 0101 randomly assigned patients to neoadjuvant or concurrent versus concurrent or adjuvant short-term ADT. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413, a 2 × 2 factorial trial, included a random assignment of neoadjuvant or concurrent versus adjuvant short-term ADT. The neoadjuvant or concurrent ADT arms of both trials were combined into the neoadjuvant group, and the arms receiving adjuvant ADT were combined into the adjuvant group. The primary end point of this meta-analysis was progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsThe median follow-up was 14.9 years. Overall, 1,065 patients were included (531 neoadjuvant and 534 adjuvant). PFS was significantly improved in the adjuvant group (15-year PFS, 29%

conclusionThe sequencing of ADT with prostate-directed RT has significant association with long-term PFS and MFS in localized PCa. Our findings favor use of an adjuvant over a neoadjuvant approach, without any increase in long-term toxicity.

Indexed as

Androgen AntagonistsClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicHumansMaleNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm MetastasisProstatic NeoplasmsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAndrogen Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID33275486
PMCPMC8189640
OpenAlexW3110475042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.