Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275346›Full record

ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2020

Evaluation of three qPCR for the detection of pathogenic leptospires in domestic animals in Nicaragua

Byron Flores, Nabil Halaihel, Tania Pérez-Sánchez, Jessica Sheleby-Elías, Brenda Mora, Héctor Fuertes, William Jirón

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Byron FloresCentro Veterinario de Diagnóstico e Investigación, Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, León, Nicaragua; Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España. byronfloressomarriba@gmail.com.
Nabil HalaihelDepartamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Tania Pérez-SánchezDepartamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Jessica Sheleby-ElíasCentro Veterinario de Diagnóstico e Investigación, Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, León, Nicaragua. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Brenda MoraCentro Veterinario de Diagnóstico e Investigación, Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, León, Nicaragua; Departamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Héctor FuertesDepartamento de Patología Animal, Facultad de Veterinaria, Universidad de Zaragoza, Zaragoza, España. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
William JirónCentro Veterinario de Diagnóstico e Investigación, Escuela de Ciencias Agrarias y Veterinarias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Nicaragua, León, Nicaragua. biomedica@ins.gov.co.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Molecular biology diagnostic methods such as real-time PCR should be used in Nicaragua to improve the diagnosis of leptospirosis in humans and animals. Objective: To evaluate three qPCR methods for pathogenic Leptospira detection in domestic animals. Materials and methods: Real-time PCR primers were designed for the amplification of specific regions from the Lip 32 gene of Leptospira in SYBER Green (SYBER Green-A) and TaqMan, as well in SYBER Green-B as previously published. The sequences of 12 strains obtained from the database of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) were aligned to select probes and primers. The analytical sensitivity was determined by calculating the detectable genomic equivalent while 18 pathogenic references strains and 28 negative controls were used to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of each one of the three sets in 129 urine samples of domestic animals. Results: The detection limit of four genomic equivalents per reaction was obtained from SYBR Green-A. The specificities were 94.4% (95% CI: 81.1-100.0) for TaqMan, 77.8% (95% CI: 55.8-99.8) for SYBR Green-A, while for SYBR Green-B it was 61.1% (95% CI: 35.8-86.4). In the three tests, we obtained a specificity of 100% (95% CI: 98.2-100.0). In the field samples, 26.4% were positive with SYBR Green-A and 6.1% with SYBR Green-B. Conclusion: SYBR Green-A presented the lowest detection limit while the three techniques under evaluation showed high specificity while TaqMan was the most sensitive.

Indexed as

Genes, BacterialAnimalsAnimals, DomesticBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCattleDNA ProbesDogsGene AmplificationHorsesLeptospiraLipoproteinsNicaraguaNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySheepBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsDNA ProbesLipL32 protein, LeptospiraLipoproteinsanimalsdomesticLeptospiraleptospirosis/diagnosisNicaraguapolymerase chain reaction

Identifiers

PMID33275346
PMCPMC7808766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.