ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2020
Validation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severity score (COPDSS) for primary care in a Colombian population
Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major global health problem causing high morbidity and mortality. Easy to apply, cost-effective, and available COPD severity measures are required in rural areas. Objective: To assess the validity and reliability of the COPD Severity Score (COPDSS) in Colombian patients attended in primary care. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a sample of 100 patients diagnosed with COPD according to GOLD guidelines. Convergent validity was assessed by correlating the COPDSS results with other important variables such as those assessed through the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) and the forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). Results: The COPDSS showed a significant correlation with the FEV1 (r=-0.33), with the CRQ (r=-0.57) and its dimensions: Dyspnea (r=0.51), fatigue (r=0.53), emotional function (r=0.43), and disease control (r=0.50). The factor analysis identified a single factor with a cumulative variance of 59.1%. The internal consistency analysis showed an adequate Cronbach’s alpha of 0.76. Conclusions: The use of the COPDSS as an assessment test for COPD patients in Colombia showed adequate validity, reliability, and easy application in primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.