Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275295›Full record

ArticleJournal of forensic sciences2021

The use of lateral flow immunoassays for the detection of fentanyl in seized drug samples and postmortem urine.

Daniel J Angelini, Tracey D Biggs, Amber M Prugh, Jessica A Smith, Jennifer A Hanburger, Bob Llano, Raquel Avelar, Angela Ellis, Brady Lusk, Abdallah Malik Naanaa and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of forensic sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Use of Lateral Flow Assays in Forensics.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Interpol Review of Drug Analysis 2019-2022.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel J AngeliniU.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Tracey D BiggsU.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Amber M PrughU.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Jessica A SmithDepartment of Safety and Homeland Security, Division of Forensic Science, State of Delaware, Wilmington, DE, USA.
Jennifer A HanburgerAnne Arundel County Forensic Services, Anne Arundel County Police, Millersville, MD, USA.
Bob LlanoAnne Arundel County Forensic Services, Anne Arundel County Police, Millersville, MD, USA.
Raquel AvelarAnne Arundel County Forensic Services, Anne Arundel County Police, Millersville, MD, USA.
Angela EllisAnne Arundel County Forensic Services, Anne Arundel County Police, Millersville, MD, USA.
Brady LuskAnne Arundel County Forensic Services, Anne Arundel County Police, Millersville, MD, USA.
Abdallah Malik NaanaaAnne Arundel County Forensic Services, Anne Arundel County Police, Millersville, MD, USA.
Edward SiscoMaterial Measurement Science Division, National Institute of Standards & Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Jennifer W SekowskiU.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, USA.
Anne Arundel County Public Schools · USUnited States Army Combat Capabilities Development Command · USNational Institute of Standards and Technology · USUnited States Department of Homeland Security · US

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NISTU.S. Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Directorate HSHQPM-15-X-00119U.S. Department of Homeland Security Science & Technology Directorate HSHQPM-17-X-00036
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The opioid crisis has continued to progress in the United States and the rest of the world. As this crisis continues, there is a pressing need for a rapid and cost-effective method for detecting fentanyl. Recent studies have suggested that lateral flow immunoassays (LFIs) could fill this technology gap. These qualitative paper-based assays contain antibodies designed to react with fentanyl and provide positive or negative results within a matter of minutes. In this study, two different LFI configurations for the detection of fentanyl were examined (dipsticks and cassettes) for effectiveness of detection using seized drug samples and postmortem urine samples. In the current study, 44 seized drug samples (32 fentanyl-positive, 12 fentanyl-negative) and 14 postmortem urine samples (10 fentanyl-positive, 4 fentanyl-negative) were analyzed. All 32 fentanyl-containing seized drug samples and 10 postmortem fentanyl-positive urine samples displayed positive LFI results with both LFI configurations. The fentanyl dipsticks displayed a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 75%, and an efficiency of 93.2% for seized drug samples and a sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of 100% for postmortem urine. Analysis of the fentanyl cassettes displayed a sensitivity, specificity, and efficiency of 100% for seized drug samples and a sensitivity of 100%, a specificity of 75%, and an efficiency of 92.9% for postmortem urine samples. These data point to the utility of LFIs as a quick and low resource-dependent option for presumptive detection of fentanyl in real-world situations.

Indexed as

FentanylGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryHumansIllicit DrugsImmunoassayOpioid-Related DisordersSensitivity and SpecificitySubstance Abuse DetectionFentanylIllicit Drugsfentanylforensic chemistryforensic toxicologyillicit drugslateral flow immunoassayopioidseized drugs

Identifiers

PMID33275295
PMCPMC9808492
OpenAlexW3108630801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.