Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275160›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2021

OP7, a novel influenza A virus defective interfering particle: production, purification, and animal experiments demonstrating antiviral potential.

Marc D Hein, Heike Kollmus, Pavel Marichal-Gallardo, Sebastian Püttker, Dirk Benndorf, Yvonne Genzel, Klaus Schughart, Sascha Y Kupke, Udo Reichl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A Virus Is a Community: Diversity within Negative-Sense RNA Virus Populations.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marc D HeinBioprocess Engineering, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Heike KollmusDepartment of Infection Genetics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Pavel Marichal-GallardoBioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Magdeburg, Germany.
Sebastian PüttkerBioprocess Engineering, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Dirk BenndorfBioprocess Engineering, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.
Yvonne GenzelBioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Magdeburg, Germany.
Klaus SchughartDepartment of Infection Genetics, Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Braunschweig, Germany.
Sascha Y KupkeBioprocess Engineering, Max Planck Institute for Dynamics of Complex Technical Systems, Magdeburg, Germany. kupke@mpi-magdeburg.mpg.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3943-9718
Udo ReichlBioprocess Engineering, Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The novel influenza A virus (IAV) defective interfering particle "OP7" inhibits IAV replication in a co-infection and was previously suggested as a promising antiviral agent. Here, we report a batch-mode cell culture-based production process for OP7. In the present study, a seed virus containing standard virus (STV) and OP7 was used. The yield of OP7 strongly depended on the production multiplicity of infection. To inactivate infectious STV in the OP7 material, which may cause harm in a potential application, UV irradiation was used. The efficacy of OP7 in this material was preserved, as shown by an in vitro interference assay. Next, steric exclusion chromatography was used to purify and to concentrate (~ 13-fold) the UV-treated material. Finally, administration of produced OP7 material in mice did not show any toxic effects. Furthermore, all mice infected with a lethal dose of IAV survived the infection upon OP7 co-treatment. Thus, the feasibility of a production workflow for OP7 and its potential for antiviral treatment was demonstrated. KEY POINTS: • OP7 efficacy strongly depended on the multiplicity of infection used for production • Purification by steric exclusion chromatography increased OP7 efficacy • OP7-treated mice were protected against a lethal infection with IAV.

Indexed as

Animal ExperimentationInfluenza A virusAnimalsAntiviral AgentsDefective VirusesMiceVirus ReplicationAntiviral AgentsAnimal experimentsAntiviralCell culture-based productionDefective interfering particlesInfluenza A virusOP7Steric exclusion chromatography

Identifiers

PMID33275160
PMCPMC7778630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.