Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275150›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2020

Estimated Cost-effectiveness of Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus Infection in China Using a Markov Model.

Kai Chen, Yaqin Zhong, Yuanyuan Gu, Rajan Sharma, Muting Li, Jinjun Zhou, Youjia Wu, Yuexia Gao, Gang Qin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Kai ChenDepartment of Internal Medicine, Nantong University Medical School, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yaqin ZhongDepartment of Health Management, Nantong University School of Public Health, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yuanyuan GuCentre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Rajan SharmaCentre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Muting LiDepartment of Health Management, Nantong University School of Public Health, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Jinjun ZhouDepartment of Pediatrics, Nantong Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Youjia WuDepartment of Pediatrics, Nantong University Affiliated Hospital, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Yuexia GaoDepartment of Health Management, Nantong University School of Public Health, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Gang QinDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Nantong Third People's Hospital Affiliated to Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, China.
Nantong University · CNMacquarie University · AUAffiliated Hospital of Nantong University · CNNantong Maternity and Child Health Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Congenital cytomegalovirus infection (cCMVi) is one of the most common infections associated with childhood hearing loss. Prevention and mitigation of cCMVi-related hearing loss will require an increase in newborn screening, which is not yet available in China. Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of newborn screening strategies for cCMVi from the perspective of the Chinese health care system. Design, Setting, and Participants: A decision tree for a simulated cohort population of 15 000 000 live births was developed to compare the costs and health effects of 3 mutually exclusive interventions: (1) no screening, (2) targeted screening using CMV polymerase chain reaction assay for newborns who fail a universal hearing screening, and (3) universal screening for CMV among all newborns. Markov diagrams were used to evaluate the lifetime horizon (76 years). Main Outcomes and Measures: Cost, hearing-related health outcomes, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated based on a direct medical costs perspective. Costs and ICERs were reported in 2018 US dollars. Results: Incidence of cCMVi among newborns was reported to be approximately 0.7% in China. Targeted screening was less costly but also less effective than universal screening, identifying 41% of cases needing antiviral treatment and preventing nearly half of less severe or profound hearing loss. To avoid 1 CMV-related severe or profound hearing loss, 13 and 16 newborns need to be treated by targeted and universal screening, respectively. The ICERs of targeted and universal screening vs no screening were $79 and $2087 per quality-adjusted life-year gained, respectively, at the discounted rate of 3.5%. Both screening options were cost-effective for the Chinese health care system based on the willingness-to-pay threshold of 3 × gross domestic product per capita. The sensitivity analysis showed that the prevalence of cCMVi, as well as diagnosis and treatment costs, were key factors that may be associated with decision-making. Conclusions and Relevance: To achieve cost-effectiveness and best health outcomes, universal screening could be considered for the Chinese population. While the results are specific to China, the model may easily be adapted for other countries.

Indexed as

ChinaCost-Benefit AnalysisCytomegalovirus InfectionsDecision TreesFemaleHearing LossHumansInfant, NewbornMaleMarkov ChainsNeonatal Screening

Identifiers

PMID33275150
PMCPMC7718603
OpenAlexW3107283682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.