Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33275111›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2020

A Blockchain-Based Consent Platform for Active Assisted Living: Modeling Study and Conceptual Framework.

Pedro Elkind Velmovitsky, Pedro Augusto Da Silva E Souza Miranda, Hélène Vaillancourt, Tania Donovska, Jennifer Teague, Plinio Pelegrini Morita

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Leveraging mHealth Technologies for Public Health.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pedro Elkind VelmovitskySchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7539-3193
Pedro Augusto Da Silva E Souza MirandaSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0172-8998
Hélène VaillancourtCSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-4629
Tania DonovskaCSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7702-951X
Jennifer TeagueCSA Group, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4562-969X
Plinio Pelegrini MoritaSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9515-6478
Canadian Standards Association · CAUniversity of Waterloo · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent advancements in active assisted living (AAL) technologies allow older adults to age well in place. However, sensing technologies increase the complexity of data collection points, making it difficult for users to consent to data collection. One possible solution for improving transparency in the consent management process is the use of blockchain, an immutable and timestamped ledger.

objectiveThis study aims to provide a conceptual framework based on technology aimed at mitigating trust issues in the consent management process.

methodsThe consent management process was modeled using established methodologies to obtain a mapping of trust issues. This mapping was then used to develop a conceptual framework based on previous monitoring and surveillance architectures for connected devices.

resultsIn this paper, we present a model that maps trust issues in the informed consent process; a conceptual framework capable of providing all the necessary underlining technologies, components, and functionalities required to develop applications capable of managing the process of informed consent for AAL, powered by blockchain technology to ensure transparency; and a diagram showing an instantiation of the framework with entities comprising the participants in the blockchain network, suggesting possible technologies that can be used.

conclusionsOur conceptual framework provides all the components and technologies that are required to enhance the informed consent process. Blockchain technology can help overcome several privacy challenges and mitigate trust issues that are currently present in the consent management process of data collection involving AAL technologies.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgedBlockchainHumansagingblockchaincomputer securitycomputing methodologieshealth careinformed consentInternet of Thingsmobile phone

Identifiers

PMID33275111
PMCPMC7748951
OpenAlexW3097126498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.