ReviewThe oncologist2021
Prediction and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thromboembolism.
Review in The oncologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of direct oral anticoagulants for cancer-associated thrombosis: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Ten tips for kidney biopsy in cancer patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2026Review
- Pulmonary Embolism in Patients with Lung Cancer: Incidence and Performance of Prognostic Markers.Cancers · 2026Article
- Global epidemiology and burden of multiple myeloma from 1990 to 2021 with projections to 2045 based on the global burden of disease study 2021.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- Research Advances on Targets and Mechanisms in Cancers Complicated by Cardiovascular Diseases.OncoTargets and therapy · 2026Review
- Venous Thromboembolism Management and Anticoagulation Opportunities in Cancer Patients.European cardiology · 2026Review
- Development and validation of machine learning models for assessing the risk of postoperative venous thromboembolism in cervical cancer patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Machine learning assisted radiomics in predicting postoperative occurrence of deep venous thrombosis in patients with gastric cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Venous thromboembolism prevention program implementation in a community oncology practice: a cohort study.Lancet regional health. Americas · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Identifying novel biomarkers using proteomics to predict cancer-associated thrombosis.Bleeding, thrombosis and vascular biology · 2024Article
- Prevention and control of venous thromboembolism after major orthopedic surgery through doctor-to-patient cultivation of musculoskeletal ability based on King's theory of goal attainment.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Deep Vein Thrombosis as a Complication of Gemcitabine-Capecitabine Chemotherapy in Adenocarcinoma of Gallbladder.Journal of blood medicine · 2024Article
- A nomogram for predicting the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with solid cancers.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2023Article
- The Role of Injectables in the Treatment and Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis.Cancers · 2023Review
- Acute Oncologic Complications: Clinical-Therapeutic Management in Critical Care and Emergency Departments.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Venous and arterial thromboembolism are prevalent, highly burdensome, and associated with risk of worse outcomes for patients with cancer. Risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies widely across specific cancer subpopulations. The ability to predict risk of cancer-associated VTE is critical because an optimal thromboprophylaxis strategy is best achieved by targeting high-risk patients with cancer and avoiding prophylaxis in patients with cancer at low risk for VTE. A validated risk tool for solid tumors has been available for a decade. Newer tools have focused on specific populations, such as patients with multiple myeloma. Emerging studies continue to optimize risk prediction approaches in patients with cancer. Recent randomized trials have specifically addressed risk-adapted thromboprophylaxis using direct oral anticoagulants, and revised guidelines have included these new data to formulate recommendations for outpatient thromboprophylaxis. Implementation science approaches to enhance use of outpatient prophylaxis in the context of these guideline changes are under way. However, major knowledge gaps remain, including a lack of data for inpatient thromboprophylaxis in the cancer setting and a lack of formal tools for identifying risk of bleeding. This review describes optimal approaches to risk prediction and patient selection for primary pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis of cancer-associated VTE, addresses barriers to implementing these practices, and highlights strategies to overcome them. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies widely among patients with cancer. Individual risk can be determined using validated approaches. Inpatient and postsurgical thromboprophylaxis is more widely accepted. However, most patients with cancer develop VTE in the outpatient setting. Recent randomized trials have demonstrated benefit to risk-adapted outpatient thromboprophylaxis. High-risk patients may therefore be considered for outpatient thromboprophylaxis as recommended by recently updated guidelines. System-wide implementation approaches are necessary to improve compliance with prophylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.