Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33274716›Full record

ArticleeLife2020

A putative origin of the insect chemosensory receptor superfamily in the last common eukaryotic ancestor.

Richard Benton, Christophe Dessimoz, David Moi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Accelerating Ligand Discovery for Insect Odorant Receptors.International journal of biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolution of Sensory Receptors.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Richard BentonCenter for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4305-8301
Christophe DessimozCenter for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2170-853X
David MoiCenter for Integrative Genomics, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2664-7385

Funding

FP7 Ideas: European Research Council 615094H2020 European Research Council 833548Novartis Stiftung für Medizinisch-Biologische Forschung N/ASchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 183723Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A_166646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The insect chemosensory repertoires of Odorant Receptors (ORs) and Gustatory Receptors (GRs) together represent one of the largest families of ligand-gated ion channels. Previous analyses have identified homologous 'Gustatory Receptor-Like' (GRL) proteins across Animalia, but the evolutionary origin of this novel class of ion channels is unknown. We describe a survey of unicellular eukaryotic genomes for GRLs, identifying several candidates in fungi, protists and algae that contain many structural features characteristic of animal GRLs. The existence of these proteins in unicellular eukaryotes, together with

Indexed as

AnimalsArabidopsisBiological EvolutionDrosophila melanogasterEukaryotaGenomeInsectaPhylogenyReceptors, OdorantSequence AlignmentReceptors, OdorantA. thalianachemosensory receptorcomparative genomicsD. melanogasterevolutionevolutionary biologygeneticsgenomicshomologyprotein modelling

Identifiers

PMID33274716
PMCPMC7746228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.