ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2021
Comparison of Interlaminar and Transforaminal Approaches for Treatment of L
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Full-endoscopic lumbar spine discectomy: in search of the optimal approach-a meta-analysis comparing interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy (IELD) and transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy (TELD).Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy using a 45° puncture angle and foraminotomy versus traditional THESYS for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation: a prospective randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024Trial
- Transforaminal versus interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation: meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy via a Modified Inferolateral Margin of the L5 Pedicle Projection for L5/S1 Central Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A novel transparent visual channel translates into enhanced surgical safety and efficiency for prolapsed lumbar disc herniation: a comparative clinical study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- Article
- Effect and safety of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: direct inferior endplate approach versus indirect approach.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025Article
- Intra-operative fluoroscopy exposure in endoscopic lumbar discectomies.Surgical neurology international · 2025Article
- New ipsilateral full endoscopic interlaminar approach for L5-S1 foraminal and extraforaminal decompression: technique description and initial case series.Neurosurgical review · 2024Article
- Modified Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy through the Near-spinous Process Approach for L4/5 Disc Herniation: A Retrospective Clinical Study.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Article
- Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal vs. interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective propensity score matching study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of transforaminal approach spinal endoscopy in the treatment of patients with lumbar disc herniation and the factors affecting its efficacy.American journal of translational research · 2024Article
- Radiographic characteristics-based classification system for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy surgical approach selection in patients with L5-S1 disc herniation: a hierarchical clustering analysis.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy between transforaminal and interlaminar approach: a minimum two year follow-up.International orthopaedics · 2023Article
- One-hole split endoscopy technique versus unilateral biportal endoscopy technique for L5-S1 lumbar disk herniation: analysis of clinical and radiologic outcomes.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Transforaminal Versus Interlaminar Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global spine journal · 2023Review
- Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomyFrontiers in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) in treating L
methodsA retrospective analysis of 76 patients with L
resultsSubjects in the PEID group were in surgery for 60.90 ± 13.11 min and needed intraoperative X-ray exposure 4.10 ± 1.09 times. Patients in this group were ambulatory by 7.52 ± 1.08 h after surgery and were hospitalized for 5.05 ± 0.92 days. In contrast, patients in the PETD group were in surgery for 84.06 ± 15.58 min and needed intraoperative X ray exposure 12.81 ± 8.46 times. These patients were ambulatory by 7.06 ± 0.91 h after surgery and remained in the hospital for 4.94 ± 0.80 days. Based on these data, operation time and fluoroscopy time were significantly less (P < 0.002 and P < 0.001, respectively) for subjects in the PEID group. However, ambulatory time and hospitalization were similar for both in terms of pain relief and decreased disability, and subjects in both groups responded well to the surgery and showed a significant decrease in both VAS and ODI scores at their 1-year follow-up (P < 0.01). Furthermore, there were no statistically significant differences between the two surgeries in terms of pain relief and decrease in disability.
conclusionFor L
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.