Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33274500›Full record

ArticleBirth (Berkeley, Calif.)2021

"I had to fight for my VBAC": A mixed methods exploration of women's experiences of pregnancy and vaginal birth after cesarean in the United States.

Bridget Basile Ibrahim, M Tish Knobf, Allison Shorten, Saraswathi Vedam, Melissa Cheyney, Jessica Illuzzi, Holly Powell Kennedy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Bridget Basile IbrahimUniversity of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5030-5644
M Tish KnobfSchool of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6939-8262
Allison ShortenUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham School of Nursing, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4354-1697
Saraswathi VedamDivision of Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6396-3638
Melissa CheyneyOregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5672-3353
Jessica IlluzziYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Holly Powell KennedySchool of Nursing, Yale University, Orange, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7866-1552
Yale University · USOregon State University · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Research Training: Self and Family ManagementT32NR008346 · NINR · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI GREY, MARGARET · 2003 to 2018
$4.7M
Jonas Scholars Program of Jonas Nursing and Veterans HealthcareNCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NINR NIH HHS T32 NR008346
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) is safe, cost-effective, and beneficial. Despite professional recommendations supporting VBAC and high success rates, VBAC rates in the United States (US) have remained below 15% since 2002. Very little has been written about access to VBAC in the United States from the perspectives of birthing people. We describe findings from a mixed methods study examining experiences seeking a VBAC in the United States.

methodsIndividuals with a history of cesarean and recent subsequent birth were recruited through social media groups. Using an online questionnaire, we collected sociodemographic and birth history information, qualitative accounts of participants' experiences, and scores on the Mothers on Respect Index, the Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, and the Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale.

resultsParticipants (N = 1711) representing all 50 states completed the questionnaire; 1151 provided qualitative data. Participants who planned a VBAC reported significantly greater decision-making autonomy and respectful treatment in their maternity care compared with those who did not. The qualitative theme: "I had to fight for my VBAC" describes participants' accounts of navigating obstacles to VBAC, including finding a supportive provider and traveling long distances to locate a clinician and/or hospital willing to provide care. Participants cited support from providers, doulas, and peers as critical to their ability to acquire the requisite knowledge and power to effectively self-advocate. DISCUSSION: Findings highlight the difficulties individuals face accessing VBAC within the context of a complex health system and help to explain why rates of attempted VBAC remain low.

Indexed as

Maternal Health ServicesObstetricsVaginal Birth after CesareanFemaleHumansMothersParturitionPregnancyUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33274500
PMCPMC8122048
OpenAlexW3110193356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.