Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33274400›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021

XDose: toward online cross-validation of experimental and computational X-ray dose estimation.

Philipp Roser, Annette Birkhold, Alexander Preuhs, Philipp Ochs, Elizaveta Stepina, Norbert Strobel, Markus Kowarschik, Rebecca Fahrig, Andreas Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Philipp RoserPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany. philipp.roser@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-3025
Annette BirkholdInnovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
Alexander PreuhsPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Philipp OchsInnovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
Elizaveta StepinaInnovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
Norbert StrobelInstitute of Medical Engineering Schweinfurt, University of Applied Sciences Würzburg-Schweinfurt, 97421, Schweinfurt, Germany.
Markus KowarschikInnovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
Rebecca FahrigInnovation, Advanced Therapies, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, 91301, Forchheim, Germany.
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058, Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAs the spectrum of X-ray procedures has increased both for diagnostic and for interventional cases, more attention is paid to X-ray dose management. While the medical benefit to the patient outweighs the risk of radiation injuries in almost all cases, reproducible studies on organ dose values help to plan preventive measures helping both patient as well as staff. Dose studies are either carried out retrospectively, experimentally using anthropomorphic phantoms, or computationally. When performed experimentally, it is helpful to combine them with simulations validating the measurements. In this paper, we show how such a dose simulation method, carried out together with actual X-ray experiments, can be realized to obtain reliable organ dose values efficiently.

methodsA Monte Carlo simulation technique was developed combining down-sampling and super-resolution techniques for accelerated processing accompanying X-ray dose measurements. The target volume is down-sampled using the statistical mode first. The estimated dose distribution is then up-sampled using guided filtering and the high-resolution target volume as guidance image. Second, we present a comparison of dose estimates calculated with our Monte Carlo code experimentally obtained values for an anthropomorphic phantom using metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor dosimeters.

resultsWe reconstructed high-resolution dose distributions from coarse ones (down-sampling factor 2 to 16) with error rates ranging from 1.62 % to 4.91 %. Using down-sampled target volumes further reduced the computation time by 30 % to 60 %. Comparison of measured results to simulated dose values demonstrated high agreement with an average percentage error of under [Formula: see text] for all measurement points.

conclusionsOur results indicate that Monte Carlo methods can be accelerated hardware-independently and still yield reliable results. This facilitates empirical dose studies that make use of online Monte Carlo simulations to easily cross-validate dose estimates on-site.

Indexed as

Phantoms, ImagingRadiation DosageComputer SimulationHumansMonte Carlo MethodRadiometryRetrospective StudiesX-RaysAnthropomorphic phantomDosimetryMonte Carlo simulationMOSFET

Identifiers

PMID33274400
PMCPMC7822800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.